My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-27-1989 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
1980-1989 Microfilm
>
1989
>
03-27-1989 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/28/2025 12:16:27 PM
Creation date
3/28/2025 12:14:57 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
222
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINOTBS OF REGULAR ORONO COOHCIL MEBTING MARCH 13 r 1989 <br />#1378 CURTIS OSTKOM <br />4605 WATERTOWN HOAD <br />VARIANCEThe applicant- was present for this matter, as was Mr. <br />Ugurbil, the property owner. <br />As Acting City Administrator Gerhardson explained, this <br />application required approval of a side setback variance to <br />construct an addition onto an existing residence located in a 5- <br />acre zone. The Planning Commission denied this application at <br />their February 21, 1989 meeting. Since that meeting, the <br />applicant has prepared additional information, depicting the <br />reasons why it would be best to locate the addition as proposed. <br />Mr. Ostrom informed the Council that putting the addition on <br />the north side of the house would create a disfunctiona1 floor <br />plan. Also, expanding the house to the north would interfere <br />’-iith the septic system and would bring the house closer to County <br />Road 6. Locating the addition to the east would mean destroying <br />the "farm-house" architecture of the house and would make the <br />existing dining room area into an interior room with no natural <br />lighting. It would also cause the loss of the porch structure. <br />Mr. Ostrom addressed the issue of the proximity of the addition <br />to the house next door. He showed the Council pictures of the <br />dense vegetation that would obstruct any visual impact of the <br />addition. None of Mr. Ugurbil’s neighbors had expressed any <br />opposition to his proposal. <br />Zoning Administrator Mabusth explained that uhe information <br />regarding the vegetation between the properties and the existing <br />floor plan of the house was missing at the time the Planning <br />Commission reviewed this application. In addition, the original <br />site plan was confusing to the Planning Commission because it <br />showed both the existing and proposed floor plans. Planning <br />Commission Representative Moos, concurred with Mabusth. <br />It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by CounciImember <br />Peterson, to approve the variances requested in application <br />#1378. Motion, Ayes*4, Nays=0, Motion passed. <br />#1379 WAY2ATA COUNTRY CLUB <br />200 WAYZATA BOULEVARD <br />CONDITIONAL USB PERMIT <br />RESOLUTION #2592 . ^ «Acting City Administrator Gerhardson stated that the Wayzata <br />Country Club was requesting a conditional use permit to construct <br />a pond along Fairway #12. <br />It was mo\ i by Mayor Grabek, seconded by CounciImember <br />Goetten, to adopt Resolution #2592, approving the conditional use <br />permit. Motion, Ayes=4, Nays«0, Motion passed.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.