Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #1366 <br />March 14, 1989 <br />Page 2 of 2 <br />III. The applicant feels the south line of Lot 2 should not be <br />considered as a rear lot line, since the property continues across the <br />trail. He would prefer a 50' setback to the Luce Line for <br />construction of the principal residence. Please re-state your views <br />on this Issue. The zoning code does not specifically address Mr. <br />Butterfield's ncn-contiguous situation, and the City certainly has the <br />right to impose reasonable conditions in this variance situation. <br />IV. Finally, note that tne City Attorney, City Engineer and staff are <br />reviewing applicant's concerns regarding continued use of the <br />designated wetlands for peat removal and irrigation purposes. At this <br />time the Planning Commission is not requested to address these issues.