My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-13-1989 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1989
>
03-13-1989 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 1:20:52 PM
Creation date
3/25/2025 1:17:23 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
513
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
C 'S <br />Lakeshore <br />Required <br />Existing <br />Existing <br />Proposed <br />Proposed <br />Variance: <br />Existing <br />Proposed <br />Existing <br />Proposed <br />setback: <br />- 75* <br />Principal Structure - <br />Accessory Structure ■ <br />Principal Structure ■ <br />Accessory Structure - <br />55* <br />10* <br />61* <br />59* (second level deck <br />extends 2* beyond lakefront of principal <br />residence) <br />Principal Structure <br />Principal Structure <br />Accessory Structure <br />Accessory Structure <br />20* <br />14* <br />65* <br />16* <br />or 261 <br />or 18.6% <br />or 86% <br />or 21% (second story <br />upper level deck) <br />2) Hardcover within the 0-75* Setback Area: <br />Allowed - 0 s.f. <br />Existing • 926 s.f. or 15.8% <br />Proposed * 812 s.f. or 13.5% <br />Total Reduction - 2.5% <br />B) The application involves no need for a hardcover variance <br />within the 75-250* setback area as applicant proposes removal of <br />major portions of existing hardcover within the 75-250* setback <br />area. <br />C) The use of the existing foundation will provide less of an <br />impact on the lakeshore property. <br />D) The original structure was placed on the property prior to <br />current standards for lakeshore development. <br />4. The City Council has considered this application including the <br />findings and recommendations of the Planning Commissiont reports by <br />City staffs comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed <br />variances on the healthy safety and welfare of the community. <br />5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this <br />property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other <br />property in this zoning district; that granting the variances would <br />not adversely affect traffic conditions^ light# air nor pose a fire <br />hazard or other danger to neighboring prdperty; would not merely serve <br />as a convanience to the applicant# but is necessary to alleviate a <br />demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a <br />substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping <br />with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan <br />of the City. <br />Page 2 of 5
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.