Laserfiche WebLink
mHUnS OF THB PIANHIHG COHNISSZOH MEETING FEBRUARY 21, 1989 <br />ZOEIK PILE «1378H>8TROM COHTIBUED <br />With respect to Kelley's concerns about the closeness of the <br />neighboring residence, Mr. Ugurbil explained that there was <br />dense vegetation that would *- <br />Ugurbil further added that <br />location would either intr- <br />the natural "Minnesota fax <br />main reason he purchased the t. <br />sen the addition from view. Mr. <br />'^cing the addition in another <br />\th an existing porch or with <br />er” architecture which was a <br />The Planning Commission, as a whole, concurred with Kelley's <br />views that the addition would encroach too closely to the <br />adjacent property to the west. Planning Commissioner Brown <br />reiterated his belief that there were other alternatives. <br />There were no comments from the public regarding this matter <br />and the public hearing was closed (Planning Commissioner Bellows <br />departed at this time). <br />*% <br />Zt was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Planning <br />Ccmmissioner Cohen, to deny the variance for the sideyard setback <br />for #1378, Curtis Ostrom. Motion, Ayes«5, Nays«0, Motion passed. <br />#1379 NATSATA COUETRT CLUB <br />200 NAYZATA BLVD. <br />COBDZTZOHAL USB PERMIT <br />PUBLIC HEARZVG 8x37 P.N. - 8x38 P.M. <br />The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were <br />duly noted. <br />The applicant was present for this matter. <br />Zt was moved by Planning Commissioner Cohen, seconded by <br />Planning Commissioner Hanson, to recommend approval of this <br />application. Motion, Ayes«5, Nays»0, Motion passed. <br />#1381 JACK RHODE <br />1690 SHADYNOOD ROAD <br />YAiyTBIffTTff <br />PUBLIC HBARZHG 8x39 P.N. * 8x45 P.N. <br />The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Nailing were <br />duly noted. <br />The applicant was present for this matter. <br />Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that this application <br />involved a setback for new construction within the 0*75' setback <br />area, as well as a hardcover variance for new construction. Even <br />though there is a reduction in hardcover in the 0->75* zone, <br />variance approval for new construction is required. The proposed <br />structure will be 61* from the lakeshore. The second story, <br />2-foot wide, deck, will be 59* from the lakeshore. The <br />overall reduction of hardcover in the 0-75* area will be 3%. <br />Chairman Kelley questioned whether the entire existing <br />structure would be removed. Mabusth replied that yes it would