My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-13-1989 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1989
>
03-13-1989 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 1:20:52 PM
Creation date
3/25/2025 1:17:23 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
513
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MIHOTBS of THB ORORO COOHCIL MEBTIHG op FEBRUARY 27, 1989 <br />COUNTY ROAD 51 PARKING CONTINUED <br />Shore Drive, in which he suggested the elimination of boat <br />trailer parking, as opposed to widening the road. <br />Mr. Kenton Carlson, 3498 North Shore Drive, felt that there <br />should be no parking allowed, even though it may be an <br />inconvenience. He explained that the way in which the boat <br />trailers were parked contributed a great deal to the safety <br />problem. He did not believe that the installation of the public <br />dock would alleviate the trespassing problem, but would enhance <br />it. He said that North Shore Drive was a two lane highway and <br />the shoulders were required for emergency purposes. <br />Mr. James Erler, 3448 North Shore Drive, explained that he <br />has twoTgrandchlTdren and is extremely concerned about their <br />safety. He too belirved that eliminating the parking entirely <br />would be a better resolve than the other options presented. <br />Mr. Lou Feqers, 3590 North Shore Drive, expressed his <br />opposTETon to eliminating parking along County Road 51. He said <br />that visitors to his hoiae would not have a place to park. He <br />suggested lowering the speed limit. <br />Mr. David Singer, 3520 North Shore Drive, explained that the <br />parking" issue did not affect him due to space available for <br />parking behind his house. He said he would be willing to allow <br />peih\>na to park on his lawn if necessary. He strongly believed <br />that :*.-afety should come before guest parking. <br />He expressed concern over consequences that may arise should <br />the Council not take a stand at this time. He did not want to <br />see a parking task force, comprised of non-Orono persons, making <br />decisions that directly affect Orono persons. He asked the City <br />to contact the County to inform the DNR and the LMCD that no <br />further parking can occur on County Road 51 due to the safety <br />hazard it creates. Back in 1985 when the on-street parking was <br />being proposed, it was determined that enough room should be <br />provided to permit car doors to be opened without extending into <br />the traffic lane. He said that not only wa here a safety <br />hazard for pedestrians, but also for cars try. ^ to enter into <br />traffic from a parking spot. Eliminating boat trailer parking <br />had been previously discussed but due to constitutional issues, <br />could not legally be done. <br />Ms. Mary Erler, 3448 North Shore Drive, observed that on- <br />streeF"parking on County Road 51 occurred when there were still <br />available parking spaces in the boat access lot. <br />Mr. Tom Anderson, 3550 North Shore Drive, stated that there <br />were more trucks and vans, rather than cars that parked along <br />Co-inty Road 51. This added to the sight distance problem. He <br />agtv i that parking should be eliminated and alternatives found. <br />CounciImember Goetten asked about the feasibility of <br />straightening the road to some degree. Bernhardson did not
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.