Laserfiche WebLink
c) prior dl at riots liniitation <br />4. DEVELOPMENT CRIT&HIA - The proposed ordinance as <br />currently drafted references the most closely associated <br />district for standards. Depending on the direction of <br />the Council as to where and how density Is applied the <br />other standards will be made applicable In a similar <br />manner. In addltlo.n to the base requirements of the <br />zoning oode. througfi^evlew process additional controls <br />fche#e would be Included In a "project specific" design <br />manual that becomes an additional requirement to be met <br />by the development. (The City could have a generic <br />framework developed to Indicate Issues and level of <br />detail to be addressed In project specific manual.) <br />ALTERNATIVES <br />1. Criteria from other zoning standards. <br />2. Standards based on prior zonlng/or most closely <br />related use. <br />3. "Project specific" design manual development as <br />part of developer's agreement based on a City <br />developed generic framework for a Planned <br />development specifying Issues and level of detail. <br />5- MINIMUM ACREAGE - The minimum acreage to be brought <br />In for development under a PUD was Initially drafted at <br />5 acres. This parallels the 5 acre minimum found In the <br />PID and MFPRD ordinance. This means that parcels of <br />larger size can be brought In for development, but that <br />smaller parcels under 5 acres cannot be used under the <br />PUD ordinance. The density within this 5 acre minimum <br />would be subject to Council decision as to how to <br />approach density and use. <br />ALTERNATIVES <br />A. Leave at b* acres. <br />B. Decrease. <br />C. Increase.