Laserfiche WebLink
i.T/ol/id to o-ocdinat2 1:j 3ftorts wio.i oo>. ssr <br />agencies. With its limited on laKe capacity it is working to <br />7 r 3 V i d (3 3 2 r V i ja 'vh an o 2 1 t ad on zo 2 dd r a 33 t>.e .-oo3 t <br />significant problems. The City is also concerned with <br />maintenance of water quality as it relates to polluting run <br />off and clean up around the lake. <br />4. Please describe how your city is implementing the <br />recommendations contained in the "Heport of the Lake <br />Minnetonka Task Force** (June, 1983). <br />The City of Orono is presently reviewing the Task Force <br />recommendations regarding implementation. Since Orono <br />possess one of the major access sites, the principal issue at <br />this point is consideration of the securing of parking as it <br />exists near the public access sites for off lake residents <br />including a large number of potential users from Orono. <br />(Enclosure A summaries progress to date.) <br />5. Identify any barriers you city has encountered in attempting <br />to implement the recommendations in the **Report of the Lake <br />Minnetonka Task Force.** <br />The primary issues are Council*s overall public safety <br />concerns on both the land and the lake. There has been <br />significant neighborhood concern regarding commitment of the <br />parking spots because of the attendant problems with off-site <br />parking related to the access including trespassing and <br />vandalism. As a part of this concern is the extent to which <br />an increased utilisation of the lake may escalate existing <br />problems. <br />6. Please suggest proposals fo.* public participation procedures <br />as well as intergovernmertal planning and negotiations <br />procedures to resolve lake iranagement issues. <br />It is hoped the Task Force in the development of the <br />preliminary recommendations would work closely with LMCD on <br />the water surface issues and the individual communities on <br />the land use issues. Is is suggested the departure point for <br />1 : * 3.2 c 1 n : 2 r. f : 3 2 : . \ . * 2 1 b ? : ' i 2 3 3 2 2 2 : s 3 i .2 3 2-2 <br />222:27 *23- : ! i 23 322:22 222 '?'.22.3^ <br />r 3 2 2 r : : 2" : _ : 3:: 2 2 = J j : 2 2 2 7 : cr 2 _ 2 u 2 1 i 2 e ; 2 land 233 <br />133 233 . • <br />Please conroenc and submit any suggestions on 'ina remaining <br />steps of the Council's review procedure. <br />- % -A »i 13 0 2 2 2 : 3 2 d ■; 2 a 2 2 2 2 :i j : 1 >. 0 2 : 2 2 c 2 ; 13 i a * 2 1 2 2 3 d <br />iCD and the Cities individually be allowed to respond to ^ <br />draft report in a meeting in the Lake Minnetonka ar^a.