Laserfiche WebLink
DISCUSSION - <br />.-1-* cir*9fi- *“^^53 sa;2“y ^rso-.s.us slcnc ^cad 5 1 dra noc <br />•** of balancing but raquiraa that safety be primary over any <br />convenience as it relates to parking for public access* The situation is <br />generally not great, however the City records indicate no personal injury <br />accidents along this area for the last 2 1/2 years* Actual jurisdiction <br />for road Marking is with the County* Should the City recosuaend safety <br />improvements to the County along SI following Mr. Singer's sugcestion would <br />^emove approximate^'/ 6 potentially "commitabls'* spaces whicr. perhaps the <br />wity could find sunslitut 2 slots n'^mhers to replace these. As noted i.n .'!r. <br />Singer's letter, the City has posted no parking both to the west along 19 <br />•JJ® •l»o south along 19 on both sides of this parking posted was done in <br />about 1980* It should also be noted that Mr. Singer has indicated that the <br />proposed solution back in 1985 for pedastrian walk avary 100 to 200* was <br />not an apprepriat? solution because of li.Titaticns or sheds in the <br />lakeshore. The City has generally approved small sheds in this araafor <br />storage of equipment of the type noted by Mr. Singer in hla letter upon <br />application for a variance for specifically that reason. <br />ALTIKMATIVNS - <br />Issues #1 - safsty <br />1. Request posting the entire street no parking. <br />2* Ifiden the shoulder (this asy have soas relationshj <br />MNCC project for the Orono Minnetonka Beach intercaptor)* <br />a. Bezffl curb for drainage. <br />b. Double stripping for cresting s bike pedestrian lane <br />c* Pedestrian crosswalk* <br />3. Bliaination of up to 6 parking alota intsrraittently spaced <br />eaong eixeting ones to iaprove line of eight. <br />4. Take no action. <br />5. Table. <br />6. Select the preliminary design after the staff has an initial <br />dlscusiion with the County to see what is acceptable and present <br />such to the neighbors. <br />-Parking Space Commitment <br />Take no action. <br />Commit all the slots cl itly along 51. <br />Commit a reduce number oi alots along 51. <br />tne <br />Issuas 12 <br />1. <br />2. <br />3. <br />i.T-ird 3 r--‘babl '* tb® or thf? <br />j-'ser <br />:f <br />f . i.*. • <br />RECOMMENDATION - <br />It IS recommendad that uf„sr an initial discussion at the Ccunci' <br />oeeting that a pr»Lsclurion be taken tc the County tr iiscuss vha <br />they consider to oe zeasi.,-3 ana tnat rolicwinc tnar '.-•.is ..culi ou <br />presented to the neighbors. Presently the City staff would recommend: <br />a. That the shoulder should be widen aeproxiitat lev 3* with a berm <br />curb in conjunction with the MWCC l reject. This *shculdsr would <br />encroach furtl.er into the existing lakeshore and would be additional <br />hardcover within the 0-75’.