My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-13-1989 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1989
>
02-13-1989 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 11:25:17 AM
Creation date
3/14/2025 11:23:15 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
297
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JANUARY 17, 1989 <br />ZONING FILE #1361-ORONO SCHOOL DISTRICT CONTINUED <br />It was moved by Planning Commissioner Cohen, seconded by <br />Planning Commissioner Bellows, to recommend approval of this <br />application, to allow the vacation the drainage and utility <br />easements as described on Exhibit C, based on the findings of the <br />staff as set forth in their proposal. Motion, Ayes=7, Nays*0, <br />Motion passed. <br />#1362 PAUL HAUSER <br />2801 CASCO POINT ROAD <br />VARIANCES <br />PUBLIC HEARING 8:25 P.M. - 8:40 P.N. <br />The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were <br />duly noted. <br />The applicant was present for this matter, as was Mr. Jeff <br />Schoenwetter, the applicants* developer. <br />Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Gaffron <br />explained that this was a request for variances to construct an <br />addition and decking to an existing residence. A variance will <br />be required for hardcover in the 250-500* zone. An average <br />lakeshore setback variance will also be required. <br />Chairman Kelley clarified that even though the applicant was <br />allowed credit for unused hardcover allowance in the 0-75* and <br />75-250* zones, he still exceeded the limit by 417 s.f due to <br />excessive hardcover in the 250-500* zone. Kelley suggested that <br />hardcover be removed from the garage area. Mr. Hauser indicated <br />that the portion of hardcover to the north of the garage was of <br />least importance and could be removed. Planning Commissioner <br />Hanson inquired as to the size of the garage doors. Mr. Hauser <br />replied that they were standard size for a two-car garage. <br />Hanson suggested removing a portion of the access to achieve the <br />417 s.f. Mr. Hauser felt that would not be necessary. Kelley <br />suggested allowing the applicant to remove the 417 s.f. from any <br />location he chose. <br />Gaffron explained that there was a curve on Casco Point that <br />limited sight distance from Mr. Hauser*s driveway. He believed <br />it would be best, from a safety standpoint, to maintain a turn <br />around area in Mr. Hauser*s driveway. Bellows concurred, adding <br />that the 417 s.f. removal could be achieved by taking hardcover <br />from the north of the garage, and a small portion from south of <br />garage. Mr. Hauser stated that he required the area to the south <br />for additional parking. Planning Commissioner Brown suggested <br />removal of the walkway in the front of the house. Mr. Hauser <br />stated that he would remove the 417 s.f. and leave the turn <br />around . <br />Planning Commissioner Cohen stated that in his opinion, the <br />average lakeshore setback variance should not be allowed. He <br />believed the City had been consistent in upholding the average. <br />Gaffron said that he had not received any letters from concerned <br />neighbors, nor were any present for this meeting. Kelley asked
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.