Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE HANNING COMMISSION MEETING JANUARY 17, 1989 <br />ZONING FILB #1366-BDTTBRPIELD CONTINUrD <br />Planning Commissioner Brown mentioned the fact that the <br />percolatio* testing had not yet been done. Gaffron stated that <br />soil borings were taken and preliminary testing indicates that <br />the soils were typical for ?rfe«. Before Mr. Butterfield can <br />obtain a building permit, the perc tests must be performed. <br />There were no comments from the public regarding this matter <br />and the public hearing was closed. <br />It was moved by Planning Commissioner Bellow. >conded by <br />Planning Commissioner Brown, to recommend approval of ... lication <br />#1366. Approval would be subject to staff recommendations 1 <br />through 7, and in addition thereto, that no structures be built <br />upon the area south of the Luce Line. Kelley clarified that no <br />building could begin until positive results were obtained from <br />septic tests. Gaffron added that this matter would not go before <br />the Council for final plat approval until such time as those <br />results were determined. Motion, Ayes*6, Cohen, Nay, Me. ;on <br />passed. <br />#1.j4 SIDNEY RBBBRS <br />715 NOETH BROWN ROAD <br />CONDITIONAL USB PBRMIT/PRD AND <br />CLASS III PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION <br />Mr. Rebers was present for this matter, as was Mr. Stephen <br />Pflaum and Mr. Robert Kost, representing Mr. Rebers. <br />Zoning Administrator Mabusth reviewed for thr ann ng <br />Commission the reason why Mr. Rebers was back befer ). The <br />City Council, at their December 12, 1988, meeting, mended <br />the subdivision proposal to have only 4 lots along ti.^ ,iorthern <br />property line rather than 6 This realignment would cause the <br />pad size on each of those four lots to increase considerably. <br />The Council referred this matter back to the Planning Commission <br />to have them review and determine if there was a need for <br />iditiona 1 controls on tho^^^e lors because of the larger sized <br />building pads. CounciImember Goet clarified th^» she wanted <br />the building pads on those 4 lots de leased to limi . cae size of <br />homes that could be built. <br />Bel?believed that five lots would <br />a. She stated that in nearly <br />narrow dimension to the street <br />for more lots and less street <br />:: prcpv;sal, there has been a creation <br />Planning Commissi <br />have been a more eqv <br />ail subdivisions, <br />and were deeper. i; <br />frontage. By usi> ^ a <br />of "abnoTn».«l lots- ' ■ tney hK.ve more width than depth. This <br />woni; ‘liow for mor'« \'sity in that area r.nan five lots would <br />have allowed. It was her suggestion that this matter be <br />fc warded on to the Council with a recommendation that there be 5 <br />lots along the i.orthern boundary. Planning Commissioner Johnson <br />concurred. <br />Planning Commissioner Hanson asked for a comparison of lot