My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-23-1989 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1989
>
01-23-1989 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2025 10:03:17 AM
Creation date
3/11/2025 10:02:15 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
228
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Zoning File #1353 <br />November 14, 1988 <br />Page 5 of 6 <br />Also note that the elevation of Lake Minnetonka (and the lagoon) on <br />Hovenber 8, 1988 was 926.02', or 3.38* (41**) below the normal ordinary high <br />water level of 929.4'. <br />Discussion - <br />Construction of this pool without obtaining a permit or any prior <br />approval, can only be considered a flagrant violation of Orono's codes, <br />regardless of the applicants' claim that they were unaware of the laws <br />governing development of lakeshore property. Staff is unaware of any <br />similar situation that has received approval before or after-the-fact in <br />contemporary times. In the instances where the City has approved <br />additional hardcover over and above that which pre-exists in the 0-75' <br />zone, the majority have allowed construe-ticn only along the lines of the <br />existing house and no closer to the lake than the existing house. Staff is <br />unaware of any precedent situations where hardcover in the 0-75' zone was <br />increased from 10% to as much as 28% to construct an accessory structure. <br />This property simply is not large enough to contain the proposed pool <br />in the limits of what the code allows, nor within the parameters of the <br />hardcover variances which have been allowed in hardship situations for <br />other properties in the City. Even if the drainfield system does function <br />as proposed to mitigate the effects of the run-off, the setback variance <br />requested is an extreme variance compared to others that have been granted <br />in the City. <br />As noted above, approval for the construction of the pool maintenance <br />building 3' over a neighboring property line would be approval of a new <br />non-conforming structure, which the City cannot allow. There does not <br />appear to be any location within the boundaries of the property other than <br />in the driveway in front of the garage or in the street yard, which would <br />meet the setback standards for such a structure, i.e. 10' from side lot <br />line, 10' from any other structure, 30' from the street lot line, and no <br />closer to the lake than the existing house. If the pool is allowed to <br />remain, applicants must relocate the pool maintenance and supply building.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.