Laserfiche WebLink
SPOT ZONIMG - Related to the issue of minimum acreage is <br />the issue of spot zoning. While to some degree this is <br />in the eye of the beholder, the City has approved zoning <br />areas as small as 1 acre. (Casco Run office property on <br />Shoreline Drive.) <br />6. PROCESS AMD REVIEW - While process for PUD <br />involves the staff in a more sign* j'%t role than the <br />current PRD or current PID does, the process also allows <br />early Council Involvement into significant design issues <br />that would would not be under the purview of the Council <br />in a standard rezoning or under the current PRD/PID <br />setup in the ordinances. <br />ALTERNATIVES <br />1. Further delinate the process, <br />2. Revise the process to meet Council goals. <br />7. FUTURE COUNCILS - This issue was raised by both <br />Planning Commission and Council. To the extent that the <br />zoning and the zoning amendment require a 4/5's vote as <br />does a Comprehensive Plan Amendment there is nothing <br />that precludes a future Council (or for that matter this <br />Council) from altering the direction and utilization of <br />these ordinances or similar types of ordinances or <br />ordinances of greater concern based on following the <br />appropriate process. The Council's implementation of a <br />Planned Development will need to be within the scope of <br />the City's Comprehensive Plan Amendment goals and <br />objectives. Should this Council not adopt a broader <br />Planned Development ordinance, future Council’s could, <br />rezone a property by the same vote that is required to <br />adopt a Planned Development ordinance or rezone a piece <br />of property to a Planned Development zoning. <br />ALTERNATIVES - <br />1. Do not adopt a broader Planned Development <br />ordinance. <br />2. Adopt a Planned Development that reflects <br />O