Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning Pile #1296 <br />November 23, 1988 <br />Page 2 of 4 <br />In the first part of the applicants* memo, they review the concerns <br />expressed by the City during the variance review: <br />1. Security problem for dock without principal structure. <br />2. Need for a new curb cut to serve proposed dock area on a stretch <br />of road that is heavily trafficked and with limited sight distance. <br />3. The need to install new hardcover within the lakeshore protected <br />area. <br />4. The unknown or planned use for the remaining tracts of RLS #1216. <br />5. Negative precedent by allowing a secondary accessory structure to <br />be built on property that does not have an existing primary structure. <br />6. Placement of dock by Glen Tillotson on property owned by Peterson <br />and Stodola. <br />Applicants' Response to the Concerns - <br />Response to Item 1 - they note that the shared dock security problems <br />will be minimized as the resident, Glen Tillotson, will have a vested <br />interest in policing of the dock area. <br />Response to Item 2 - the applicants propose no new curb cuts, but will <br />share the driveway access via Mr. Tillotson's existing drive and no <br />expansion is proposed. <br />Response to Item J - no additional expansion of the existing driveway <br />is proposed, therefore no additional hardcover is anticipated with the <br />shared use. <br />Response to Item 4 ~ the applicants propose purchasing all of the <br />remaining tracts currently owned by Mr. Gustofson within RLS 12? including <br />Parcel 0003 and legally combining them as one unit. <br />Response to Item 5 - a secondary or accessory structure - the <br />residential dock will now be placed on a property that can now receive <br />credit of Mr. Tillotson's principal structure.