Laserfiche WebLink
NIHUTBS OF THE OROMO COUNCIL MBBTIN6 OP DBCBHBBR 12, 1988 <br />#1358 PB16/J0HHS0N <br />627/629 NORTH FBRMDRLB ROAD <br />RESOLUTION #2561 <br />The applicants were not present for this matter. <br />City Administrator Bernhardson explained that this <br />application involved renewal of a subdivision of a lot line <br />rearrangement that had not been previously filed. <br />It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by CounciImember <br />Peterson, to adopt Resolution #2561, approving the renewal of <br />subdivision of a lot line rearrangement for Mr. Feig and Mr. <br />Johnson. Motion, Ayes*5, Nays*0, Motion passed. <br />MAYOR'S REPORT: <br />ORONO/LON6 LAKE DISCUSSIONS <br />Mayor Grabek reported that he met with Long Lake and it was <br />agreed that a public statement should be made pertaining to the <br />options available regarding the sewer plant property. One option <br />would be to leave the property for the Long Lake sewer plant <br />within the City of Orono. Reimbursement for any monetary gains <br />or losses from taxes would possibly occur through contractual <br />means. The second option would involve giving the sewer plant <br />property to the City of Long Lake, and use the same method of <br />reimbursement as proposed in Option one. <br />Mayor Grabek stated that in his opinion. Long Lake would <br />have to be financially responsible for any costs in the event <br />property is given to Long Lake. He expressed his preference by <br />stating that it wouls!. make more sense to keep the property in <br />Orono. <br />CounciImember Goetten asked when a public hearing pertaining <br />to this issue was to be scheduled. Mayor Grabek replied that <br />there would not be a public hearing, but rather an opportunity <br />during a Council meeting would be provided for citizens to <br />express their concerns and opinions. CounciImember Nettles <br />inquired as to how adjacent property owners would be notified? <br />Mayor Grabek responded that information would be provided in the <br />Mayors Letter in addition to individual letters being sent to <br />adjacent property owners. Goetten asked that the boundary for <br />sending individual letters be extended beyond the standard 300*. <br />CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: <br />COUNTY ROAD 51 <br />City Administrator Bernhardson gave a brief summary of this <br />application. Mr. David Singer had requ sted that the safety <br />issue of County Road 51 be examined.^ Bernhardson had been in <br />contact with Hennepin County personnel and they suggested 3 <br />alternatives for improving safety.