Laserfiche WebLink
CITY OF ORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO. 7561 <br />A2. The Property is located in the LR-1A (One -Family Lakeshore Residential) Zoning <br />District. <br />A3. The lakeside slope on the Property is not defined as a Bluff. <br />A4. The Property is within Tier 1 and hardcover is limited to 25% according to the <br />Stormwater Quality Overlay District. The Applicant proposes 18.8% total site hardcover. <br />A5. The Applicant requests a conditional use permit to construct a new retaining wall within <br />the lakeshore setback to support a permitted lake access stair. <br />A6. In considering this application for a conditional use permit, the Council has considered <br />the advice and recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the <br />proposed conditional use permit upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, <br />existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public <br />safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. <br />CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ANALYSIS: <br />The City Council may approve a conditional use permit for the construction of retaining walls <br />as long as the walls are: <br />B1. Designed to correct an established erosion problem; the proposed retaining wall will <br />provide slope stability in the area around the stair landing. Repeated access to the lake <br />stair over time may cause erosion in the future if left in its present condition. This <br />criterion is met; and <br />B2. Suitable given the demonstrated need; the proposed retaining wall is suitable as the <br />walls are minimal to provide safe access within the excessive slope leading to the stair <br />landing. This criterion is met; and <br />B3. Designed by a registered engineer or landscape architect, depending on the project <br />scope; the proposed retaining walls were designed by a professional landscaping <br />company but certifications were not provided with the submittal. Staff finds the proposal <br />to have a minimal scope given the size of the proposed wall. This criterion is met; <br />and <br />B4. Designed to be the minimum size necessary to control the erosion problem; the <br />proposed retaining wall is designed to be minimal and will provide safe, level access to <br />the existing lake stair from the lakeyard. This criterion is met. <br />86 <br />