My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-10-2025 CC Agenda Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2025
>
03-10-2025 CC Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/7/2025 3:48:13 PM
Creation date
3/7/2025 2:04:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Administration
Admin Doc Type
AGENDA PACKETS
Section
ADMINISTRATION
Subject
Regular Meeting
Retention Effective Date
3/10/2025
Retention
Permanent After File Date
Protection
Public
Supplemental fields
Code
ADM 00500
Date
3/10/2025
Description
Council Meeting Packet
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
406
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Minutes <br />Planning Commission Regular Meeting <br />Tuesday, February 18, 2025, 6:00 PM <br />City Council Chambers 2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 <br />turnaround for the fire department and the timeline for developing the project in its multiple stages. They <br />indicated they were generally in favor of the application but felt more information is needed. <br />Kirchner moved, Prchal seconded, to deny LA24-000054, 430 Old Crystal Bay Road <br />North, Conditional Use Permit. VOTE: Ayes: 3, Nays 4 (Ressler, Brandabur, Bollis and <br />Jarnot). MOTION FAILED. <br />Ressler moved, Bollis seconded, to table LA24-000054, 430 Old Crystal d North, <br />Conditional Use Permit. VOTE: Ayes: 6, Nays 1 (McCutcheon). <br />6.2 LA24-000059, BLUE PENCIL COLLECTIVE O/B/O FLE S, 215 <br />NORTH ARM LANE, PRELIMINARY PLAT: "ID ALE S ", <br />PUBLIC HEARING, REVIEW #2 <br />The Planning Commission is requested to review the Sta , rec ' resentation�d discuss and <br />take action on the proposed revised preliminary plat consis f forming lots rather than the <br />original six. <br />The Planning Commission discussed the ite question1f and the applicant, Kasey <br />Johnson of Blue Pencil Collective. mombi <br />Chair Bollis opened the public hearing at 7:27 <br />Mary Larson, 366 North Arm if the oad serving the area would be wide enough as <br />two cars are not able to pas <br />Mike Demeuse, 350 No Lan he want push back on the idea that exceptions should be <br />made to allow this develo o ce ith negative impacts on the neighboring residents. <br />Mandy Little h Ar e, said their property would be the one that would have a cul-de-sac <br />all along i of s She quoted from the 2040 comprehensive plan regarding the <br />lo on impact deverural residents. <br />Randall 100 Bays <br />i il, said he had a number of questions but added he has concerns about lot 4 <br />in the plat s of ele s and run-off into the wetland. He said it seemed like a lot of pavement to <br />get to the to <br />Melissa DerneullWorth Arm Lane, asked if the commissioners had been out and looked at the <br />property as she w them to understand how much is wetland and how much has the capacity to be <br />developed. <br />Chair Bollis closed the public hearing at 7:39 p.m. <br />Bollis explained the wetlands are controlled by the watershed district and approval would be contingent <br />upon their approval. <br />Page 2 of 8 <br />263 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.