My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 5344
Orono
>
Resolutions, Ordinances, Proclamations
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7399
>
Reso 5300 - 5399 (April 11, 2005 - November 14, 2005)
>
Resolution 5344
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/5/2015 1:38:35 PM
Creation date
11/5/2015 1:38:35 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
, � <br /> �O� . <br /> • O O <br /> �� CITY of ORONO <br /> � <br /> ,� _ � <br /> ,a � <br /> ti <br /> � RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> ��`�k'ESSO��G NO. � � � 44 <br /> 3. The Planning Commission reviewed this application at a public hearing <br /> held on May 16, 2005 and recommended approval of lot width and <br /> average lake setback variances based on the following findings: <br /> a. The property has 44,610 s.f. (1.02 acre) in lot area and 109' of lot <br /> width at the shoreline and 123' at the 75' setback. <br /> b. No additional land is available for acquisition by the applica�lts to <br /> make the property conforming in width. � <br /> c. A lagoon exists on the neighboring property to the north which <br /> accounts for the home to the north to be set back considerably from the <br /> applicant's property, thus making an unnatural average lakeshore <br /> • setback line. <br /> d. The applicant's property contains a long shared driveway serving 4 <br /> other residences. The driveway and hardcover are entirely on the <br /> applicant's property and the hardcover is applied toward the 75'-250' <br /> hardcover allowance; This shaxed driveway situation would not be <br /> allowed if the lots were subdivided today as an Outlot or a public road <br /> would be required for this type of shared access. This sllared driveway <br /> configuration acts as a hardship that supports the 75' —250' hardcover <br /> variance for this complete rebuild sit�iation. <br /> e. The property is served with municipal sewer. <br /> f. The property is similar in size to many of the lots in this neighborhood. <br /> g. The average setback variance will have no impact on lake views <br /> enjoyed by the neighboring property owners. <br /> 4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings <br /> and recommendation of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, <br /> comments by the applicant and the public, and the effect of the proposed <br /> variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. <br /> • 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are <br /> peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning <br /> district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic <br /> . Page2of6 . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.