Laserfiche WebLink
0 0 <br /> C ITY of OR <br /> ONO <br /> ti <br /> ti <br /> RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL SII04�G NO. a �qj 1 9:i <br /> a. No further encroachment of the average lakeshore setback will result <br /> with construction of the lakeside porch in the same location, and <br /> therefore no existing lake views enjoyed by neighboring property will <br /> be impacted negatively. <br /> b. Placement of the existing hot tub on the roof of the lakeside porch, <br /> while technically an encroachment, will not negatively impact views to <br /> the lake enjoyed by neighboring property owners due to the height. <br /> c. The current location of the hot tub is non-conforming in that it is <br /> within 10' of the side lot line. <br /> d. The deck and fence existing on the side lot line in place for use of the <br /> hot tub, will be removed. <br /> e. Excess hardcover within the 75'-250' zone will be removed and result <br /> in a conforming percentage of 25%. <br /> f. The proposed roof overhang attached to the principal structure and to <br /> extend to 5' from the detached garage will merely be an extension of <br /> the existing non-conforming building-to-building setback existing <br /> between the house and detached garage. <br /> g. The proposed roof overhang will meet the required 10' setback to the <br /> side property boundary. <br /> 4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings <br /> and recommendation of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, <br /> comments by the applicants and the public, and the effect of the proposed <br /> variances on the health, safety and welfare of the community. <br /> 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are <br /> peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning <br /> district; that granting the variances would not adversely affect traffic <br /> conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring <br /> property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is <br /> necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to <br /> preserve a substantial property right of the applicants; and would be in <br /> Page 2 of 6 <br />