My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 5314
Orono
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7499
>
Reso 5300 - 5399 (April 11, 2005 - November 14, 2005)
>
Resolution 5314
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/5/2015 1:23:07 PM
Creation date
11/5/2015 1:23:07 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
. � • <br /> 7 O� . <br /> • O s. O <br /> -� g CITY of ORONO <br /> � - ; � . <br /> , ti <br /> ti <br /> RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> G <br /> 6' <br /> L�kESI3�4� NO. e�D e� I � <br /> a. While the area proposed as an addition is larger than the existing house <br /> footprint, the majority of the addition will consist of an attached <br /> garage. <br /> b. The detached garage located at the road will be removed to offset the <br /> new structure and hardcover associated with the proposed attached <br /> garage. <br /> c. The applicants have agreed to remove all excess hardcover, including <br /> a non-confonning shed, within the 0-75' lake setback zone. <br /> d. A significant decrease in hardcover in the 75'-250' zone from 49.5% <br /> to 30% is feasible, but reduction to the 25% limit would require <br /> . relocating the house unusually close to the road and/or downsizing the � <br /> house significantly below the 15% lot coverage limit. <br /> e. A 250'-500' zone does not exist on the property which would <br /> normally allow for a detached garage and less hardcover within the <br /> 75'-250' zone. <br /> f. The size footprint proposed is not out of character with the <br /> neighborhood, and does not exceed the structural coverage limit for <br /> the property. <br /> 4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings <br /> and recommendation of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, <br /> comments by the applicants and the public, and the effect of the proposed <br /> variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. <br /> 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are <br /> peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning <br /> � district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic <br /> conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring <br /> property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is <br /> • necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to <br /> preserve a substantial property right of the applicants; and would be in <br /> Page 2 of 6 . � <br /> �: ; '. . ., , <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.