My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-26-1990 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
1990-1996 Microfilm
>
1990
>
11-26-1990 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/21/2025 12:49:36 PM
Creation date
2/21/2025 12:48:23 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
287
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 13, 1990 <br />â– AVARRE HEIGHTS DRAINAGE CONTINUED <br />Cook showed a drawing of the drainage pattern and ponding <br />areas. He said, ''Ponding area two is a concern because of Lot <br />34. There was a drainage ditch between the house and trees, but <br />that has been filled in. There is a driveway there now. There <br />has also been some filling on the church property. All of the <br />drainage overflow potential has been eliminated. The draintile <br />that comes in from the nort*- side of Togo Road is approximately <br />1^ feet below the wetlands. The outlet to the draintile is <br />actually lower than the marsh. That was probably not the case <br />when the draintile was installed. There is also an open ditch in <br />this area that needs to be cleaned out. It is full of dead <br />trees, leaves and debris. The storm sewer pipe from Livingston <br />Avenue is going to change the flow to the Togo Road area by <br />approximately 20% in a five year storm. At this time 80% of the <br />water from a five year storm goes down to that area over land. <br />What needs to be done here is that a form of overflow drainage <br />route should be created again- The ditch should be cleaned out. <br />That should occur whether or not the Livingston storm sev;er <br />project is done. This is an entirely separate issue." <br />Bernhardson said, "The question is whether or not we expand <br />the Livingston drainage project to include Togo Road or handle <br />each project separately. If we expand the Livingston project, it <br />would be necessary to hold anoth'* * Public Hearing. If we proceed <br />with the projects separately we could hold a Project Hearing for <br />the Livingston drainage project at the next meeting. Staff could <br />then provide information to Council as to the options available <br />for addressing the Togo Road problem. There is also the option <br />of providing a temporary solution to the Cuff's problem." <br />Gerhardson explained that it would be possible to cut a <br />swale on the Cuff's property to alleviate water ponding on the <br />road. He said, "This could be done very quickly with minimal <br />expense. This would provide a solution while the City decides <br />whether or not to proceed with a storm sewer project in the <br />spring." <br />Acting Mayor Callahan stated that the Livingston drainage <br />matter was tabled at the last meeting due to the introduction of <br />the Togo Road problem. He said, "However, prior to the October <br />22nd Council meeting. Council voted to have the plans and <br />specifications drawn. Where do we go from here?" <br />Bernhardson replied, "At the next meeting we v/ould hold a <br />formal project hearing. If Council determines that they wish to <br />proceed beyond that step, the City would obtain bids for the <br />project. Once bids are received, a Public Assessment Hearing <br />would be held. Once the final financial information is known, <br />the assessment would be ordered. The City would allow the 33-day <br />appeal period to lapse before deciding to order the project." <br />- 12 -
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.