Laserfiche WebLink
FILE # LA24-000066 <br />18 February 2025 <br />Page 2 of 8 <br /> <br /> <br />domesticated animals or farm animals. Staff is considering pigeons as farm animals (fowl) as the pigeons <br />will be kept outside of the existing single-family residence in a zoning district that permits the keeping of <br />farm animals. Sections 62-1 and 78-1 of Orono’s City Code define farm animals as “cattle, horses, mules, <br />sheep, goats, swine, ponies, ducks, geese, turkeys, chickens, guinea hens and honeybees.” Chapter 62 <br />also defines animals as “farm animals and all other animals, reptiles and feathered birds or fowl except <br />dogs, domestic cats, gerbils, hamsters and caged household birds”. Neither of the relevant Code Chapters <br />provide standards specific to the keeping of pigeons. <br /> <br />Staff conducted research of zoning regulations in other communities in the Twin Cities area, and other <br />similarly-sized rural communities within Minnesota. Most communities do not have a broad definition of <br />domesticated animals that could include pigeons, or reference pigeons whatsoever. Only one community <br />studied, the City of Champlin, defines pigeons, regulates them, and requires an annual permit. <br /> <br />The pigeons in this situation are domesticated show pigeons and have been described by the applicants <br />as similar to other fowl or feathered birds, but kept in a manner more akin to farm animals in an outdoor <br />building. <br /> <br />Practical Difficulties Analysis <br />Applicant Submittal Information: <br />The applicant has provided responses to the City’s practical difficulty criteria. They indicate the lot size is <br />unchangeable and excludes them from having farm animals. Additionally, they have selected a location <br />on their property that best mitigates the potential impacts of the pigeons. By siting the coop 35 feet from <br />the eastern property line and 55 feet from the southern property line, they will use existing tree coverage <br />to screen the coop from other properties and East Long Lake Road. <br /> <br />Planning Staff Practical Difficulty Analysis: <br />Staff does not view a nonconforming lot size as a practical difficulty to support a conditional use permit <br />for an accessory use, keeping farm animals. The property owners already have a conforming, primary <br />residential use on the site. The minimum lot area requirements of one (1) acre for the dwelling and one <br />(1) acre for each animal unit are in place to provide separation from the animals and adjacent neighbors. <br />If the property cannot meet the minimum area requirements it may not be a good fit for keeping farm <br />animals. If pigeons are found to be less impactful than traditional farm animals, the proposed location <br />within 75 feet of the adjacent property lines may be reasonable. The existing natural features of the <br />wooded property and topography may screen the use from neighbors. <br /> <br />Conditional Use Permit (Sections 78-303) <br />Section 78-303(3) states: <br />Keeping of farm animals for noncommercial purposes and for the use of the occupants of premises, <br />provided that: <br />b. Where the applicant requests a conditional use permit to keep farm animals other than horses, <br />there must be at least one acre for the dwelling and one acre for each animal unit. Calculations <br />of minimum acreage required shall not include any land defined as a wetland or wetland buffer <br />under Section 78-1602: <br />This criterion has not been met. A variance is requested to allow farm animals on the subject <br />property which is 0.77 acres in size. <br /> <br />c. Any building or structure associated with the animals is located more than 150 feet from the <br />nearest adjacent residence and at least 75 feet from the nearest lot line: <br />201