My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-13-1990 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1990
>
11-13-1990 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/29/2025 2:34:03 PM
Creation date
2/18/2025 9:48:42 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
493
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
To: Mayor Grabek & Orono Council MembersCity Administrator Bernhardson <br />Proa: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator <br />Date: October 5, 1990 <br />Subject: #1579 Garry & Marie Everson, 4755 North Shore Drive - <br />After-the-fact Variance - Denial Resolution - <br />Revised Proposal <br />List of Exhibits <br />Exhibit A - Survey with Revised Propc i <br />Exhibit B - Denial Resolution <br />Exhibit C - Notice of Council Action 9/24/90 <br />Exhibit D - Memo & Exhibits of 9/17/90 <br />Discussion - <br />At your September 24th meeting. Council votec >-*0 to <br />conceptually deny the after-the-fact variances to allow expansion <br />of the deck on the west end of this property. Council indicated <br />that this conceptual denial would require that the deck be <br />converted back to its original dimensions. <br />Council also indicated to the applicant that because this <br />wcis a conceptual denial, that applicant would have the ability to <br />present a revised proposal before final action. <br />Applicants are proposing two revisions which they have <br />discussed with staff (see Exhibit A), Applicants would remove <br />all portions of deck located over the property line and less than <br />10‘ from the property line. They would also agree to remove <br />approximately 6S4 s.f. of crushed rock hardcover area between the <br />house and road, replacing this with sod so that it no longer is <br />hardcover. This would leave a deck arta of approximately 398 <br />s.f. plus the stairway, and coupled with the 664 s.f. crushed <br />rock conversion to sodded area reduces hardcover to 5,142 s.f. <br />(49.9%) as compared to the currently existing 57.3% or the pre <br />existing 54.7%. As a comparison, Walter Krahl next door, the <br />neighbor who shares the driveway, was allowed 51.6% 75-250' <br />hardcover to construct additions. <br />Staff Keen— n ndation <br />The denial resolution attached requires that the applicants <br />remove all portions of new deck that exceed the pre-existing <br />13'xl8* < ack/stairway, and grants after-the-fact variances to <br />hardcover and average setback to allow replacement in kind of the <br />pre-existing deck and stairway, continuing the hardcover at its <br />pre-existing 54.7%. Council has the following options:
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.