Laserfiche WebLink
ORONO REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING BE^D MAY 29, 1990 <br />LIVINGSTON AVENUE DRAINAGE CONTlNTirD <br />obtain a petition of 35% of tbe area property owners. <br />It was moved by Counciimember Hetties, seconded by Mayor <br />Ccabek. to direct staff to continue tw explore options to resolve <br />draina,. pr-bl«t. In the oeantiae. t.he City maintains its <br />position of agreeinq to order the stom sewer projec- -- ^5% of <br />the residents agree to sign a petition asiting -or tna projec-. <br />Motion, Ayes-5, Nays-0. Motion passed. <br />HICoUAT 12 CORRIDOR MEETING <br />Bernhardson informed Council thaw he has <br />confirmation of the date for the Policy Meeting. <br />not received <br />arLTTrovided information regarding the history of <br />Hr. Per:^e's busings and apprised Council of ^ <br />that have occurred (See Mark Bernnardson s memo dawed May -S, <br />1990). Bernhardson stated that he has received • * <br />and MTS. Kramer, Bayside Floral, ana (Vir. and <br />ParK Spur, expressing concern about the safety ha..a.>- ^ <br />is creatine in its present location. He said that ilr. <br />Pchke'^attorney, rJ. Indritr, had indicated^thot tlr. ^eaveny had <br />given Mr. Penke oermis n to seix ^rom his proper ..y. <br />L.-nhardson also r ‘ t.h:- letter had be in <br />and Mrs. Butterf: jtt.-ing acainst transient me..whanis <br />general. <br />Mayor Grabek as<ed Mu:. Pen'<e why 1-e had not applied for a <br />license in the last two years. <br />Mr. Penke su.'ited t.hat at the April 1 . 1988 <br />there was discussion as to whether he was class-..lec as a <br />solicitor. He said that Council had asked Mr. Larson, the <br />property owner, to submit an application to rezone <br />lo Commercial, but that did not occur. Mr. Pe^xe said wh«t he <br />was notified of the need for a license by the Police Of f iCi. that <br />ticketed and shut him down on Mother's Day. <br />Mr. Indritz stated that in his opir , communication has <br />been * problem. He said that ilr. Penke ha^ ^old flowers ^rom one <br />locatioS for 5 years and there have beer no complaints about the <br />business during that period of time. Mr. Indritz <br />xefety issue seems tc be a new concern end was n 9 <br />previously to Mr. Penke*s attention. He noted that <br />Penke*s competitors that have written to the City reg <br />safety issue. He said that there have been <br />incidences of safety hazards during the last ^ ; <br />Indritz stated that the Ordinance Amendment regarding trans-.<. n <br />merchants did not take place until after the Penke s appearanct^ <br />- 20 - <br />G