Laserfiche WebLink
Aach other, however, the larger the cost of the <br />project the nora difficult it becomes. <br />2. Public Financing - This would entai. tne Citv <br />engaging "a concractor and specially assessing the <br />cost against the storm sewer area that is servec^. <br />Not only does this put the city's stamp o: approva- <br />on the project but regardless ot the route ta<en puts <br />^he city at risk for financing to the degree tne ris< <br />hks not been limited by special assessment waivers. <br />l.rUz-nl-ar situation. Tbe underground solution would -frZJiViiVar ««i*-uation. The underground <?olution would be built to <br />solution may in fact result in tne ^22umpji‘0n <br />any storm, while this may not be the ^ase, it may ..a..c.e ^n. <br />water better than not doing anything. <br />as part of the solution. <br />ALTERNATr;r:s <br />Issue 1^ Public Hearing <br />1. Hold the public hearing. <br />2. Close the public hearing. <br />3. Continue the public hearing <br />Issue 2. Develoaraent of Plans and Soecs^ <br />1. Direct plans and specs be developed. <br />2. Direct an alternative system be designed <br />3. Take no action. <br />4. Table for further discussion. <br />Issue 3. <br />1. Approach <br />a) Status Quo <br />b) Aboveground <br />c) Underground <br />2. Financial <br />a) Private <br />b) Public <br />c) Waiver of Assessment <br />av/«nMMPNnATiON - It is reconunended that the public hearing b® <br />n*ia .no neighblcf “hivf a|re^" Von" a“"soVution <br />they desire the City to do a <br />public project. <br />.<7T. . <br />I <br />&