Resolution 5470 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

�O _V O O • 3 CITY of ORONO a � RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL `�kEsK0 NO. 5 4 7 Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS This application was reviewed as Zoning File #05-3185. 2. The property is located in the (I) Industrial District. The property is subject to a number of prior approvals documented in Resolutions No. 4845 (August 2002); No. 4993 (June 2003); No. 5059 (October 2003); No. 5084 (November 2003); No. 5250 (November 2004); and No. 5388 (October 2005). 3. Applicant proposes a 150' x 175' (25,620 s.f.) addition to the main building, squaring off the southwest corner of the building. 4. Applicant proposes to create a 10' x 25' walkway connection between the two existing detached truck garages. 5. Applicant proposes to abandon the south half of the 200' x 200' parking lot extension approved in 2005, which has has been graded and graveled, but not paved. Applicant is proposing to create a new 160' x 220' (35,000 s.f.) parking area directly south of the new main building addition, plus a new 26' x 210' (5,500 s.f.) connecting driveway south of the truck garage. The net result is 20,500 s.f. of bituminous hardcover over and above the level of previous approvals. 6. Applicant requests a CUP per Section 78-1366 to allow two (2) 60 -foot high flag poles, where the code would normally limit such poles to 40'. One would be located directly behind the new monument sign adjacent to Highway 12, the second to be located in the midpoint of the large easterly parking area, about 450' south of Highway 12 and 180' west of the east lot line. 7. Applicant requests an amendment of the existing CUP conditions within Resolution No. 4845 to allow, as part of the fleet sales and leasing element of the operation, more than the 40 `demonstration' or `display' vehicles currently allowed, but those in excess of 40 would be stored to the south end of the east lot. 8. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on April 17, 2006 and on a vote of 5-1 recommended approval all elements of the current request with the exception of the Page 2of8