My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-22-1990 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1990
>
10-22-1990 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/10/2025 11:17:13 AM
Creation date
2/10/2025 11:15:22 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
448
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING HELD OCTOBER ft, 1990 <br />ZONING FILE #1588 - US WEST MEW VECTOR GROUP CONTINUED <br />{;Ower, the beam may have to be sha|.ed and they may need a <br />secondary tower in another commercial industrially zoned area. <br />Ke feels tnis is net the only answer. He also states, "We were <br />told by the City that this is a 2 acre res idential ly zoned area <br />and I never thought I would come to a Council meeting to see the <br />big guns of US West, especially the attorney, threatening us to <br />say we will put this tower here and litigate if you guys don't <br />approve. I don't think this is the way US West should go about <br />it's business.” <br />Bruce Clark, 625 Old Long Lake Road, states he has just <br />spent thousands of dollars on a deck overlooking a very scenic <br />marsh and this tower is unacceptable. <br />Cathy Hollimon added that there was never a neighborhood <br />meeting. The first they heard about this was when someone wanted <br />to take pictures in their back yard and stressed the point that <br />this would be done by the end of this year. <br />Callahan stated that it seems an attempt had been made to <br />contact residents. <br />Mabusth stated that the applicant was using tax records that <br />were about a year old and the Hollimons were new homeowners and <br />didn't get the notice. <br />Steven Champlin, 50 Myrtlewood, also opposes the tower, <br />primarily for aesthetic reasons. He expressed concern over <br />seeing the tower on the Luce Line as well as from his horn He <br />expressed concern over the hazard of towers to birds. He <br />complimented the US West group in their handling of this matter <br />but does not want to see this tower in leir neighborhood. <br />JoEllen Hurr, 930 Partenwood Road, asked if ' ‘ * Church would <br />not lose their tax-exempt status if a commercial operation were <br />on their f :te. <br />Acting Mayor Callahan responded 'ihat it is possible that the <br />income :: rom the project may be taxable but the Church would <br />probably not lose it's status but does rr. know for sure. <br />Betty WeJ..ls, 70 Myrtlewood Road, stated that the Church has <br />changed hands three times since it was built and this group may <br />leave once the tower is built also. <br />Ray Wells, 70 Myrtlewood Road, stated that they do look <br />directly in that direction and would be looking directly at the <br />tower at all times. <br />Gabriel Jabbour, 985 Tonkawa Road, indicated that he and <br />JoEllen Hurr had worked on the original draft of the ordinance in <br />the early 1970's. The intent of the people who wrote the code <br />was that antennas of this kind would not be allowed in Orono. He
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.