My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-22-1990 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1990
>
10-22-1990 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/10/2025 11:17:13 AM
Creation date
2/10/2025 11:15:22 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
448
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
91390.5 <br />TO: <br />FROM: <br />DATE: <br />Mayor and City Council <br />Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrate <br />September 13, 1990 <br />'' 1 -C'; <br />SUBJECT: Storm Sewer System - Navarre Heights Area <br />Attachment: <br />ISSUE - <br />A. Storm Sewer Memo Dated 8/23/90 <br />B. Hearing Notice Published 9/10 and 9/17/90 <br />to ordering plans and1. Hold a public hearing prior <br />specifications on the project. <br />2. Determine whether Council desires to have plans and specs <br />developed on the project. <br />3. Determine type of desired solution. <br />INTRODUCTION - This issue was discussed at the Council*s^ August <br />21 f 19$(5 irfeeting with a public hearing scheduled for the <br />September 24, 1990 meeting. Attachment 3 reflects the h.aring <br />notice that was transmitted. <br />DISCUSSION - In addition to the issue of whether the Counc^il <br />desires to go ahead with the proposed project or not is an issue <br />what alternatives exist for resolving the issue. Alternatives <br />regarding the storm -.^ater ponding are as follows: <br />A. Status Quo - Taking action to leave matters^as they <br />are with no formal drainage system. The resident may <br />choose to do something minimal on their property. <br />B. Surface Drainage - As noted in Attachment A a surface <br />drainage outline had Deen prepared as a possible <br />alternative that could be done privately. It is our <br />understanding that a neighborhood petition to request <br />that this matter be undertaken and the City do so as a <br />public project to be assessed has been circulated <br />although the City has not received a copy. <br />C. Underground Storm Water Piping - This is the project <br />that has been proposed for a considerable period of time <br />and is designed for a five year storm. In this <br />situation this may be more expensive than a surface <br />solution, but also the one that perhaps limits the <br />city's liability tv. the greatest degree. <br />• In addition the alternatives for financing are: <br />1. Private Financing - Any of these alternatives <br />could be "do’ne by the neighbors in conjunction with I
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.