My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-22-1990 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1990
>
10-22-1990 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/10/2025 11:17:13 AM
Creation date
2/10/2025 11:15:22 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
448
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
B. REVIEW OF STAFF AND PROJECTIONS <br />The committee went over all of the current staff positions and how they were broken down <br />between specific Orono services and those for contract communities. With the numbers <br />of staff and their projections as presented, the committee concensus was that the staff <br />projections seemed appropriate. There was considerable discussion that the City needed <br />to have its own Assessor. For engineering services, the committee felt that it was a <br />function of the council review and the cost of in-house services versu > the cost for <br />consultant. The committee understood that as development increased in the community. <br />0 in-house services became more affordable. The overall projections for staff and area <br />. ,r all City Hall represents 1.064 square feet which would cost approximately $85,000. <br />There was discussion among the committee as to whether this area should be reduced <br />The comminee felt that it was such a small portion that keeping it in the overall square <br />footage allowed for expansion, regardless of whether it was for the specific staff currently <br />being discussed. The committee reviewed the potential growth at Orono in relationship to <br />the potential for expansion. Based strictly on population growth, as per the current <br />development ordinance, it was agreed that Orono ’s population, at 9-10.000 would be the <br />maximum for the 10-15 year time frame. The overall assessment was that the staff and <br />service projections as stated would provide Orono for the next 10-15 years. The <br />committee did feel that any building site should have ample room for expansion in case <br />the overall future of Orono was dramatically changed due to development or incorporation <br />of other community services through expanded contracts. <br />C. BUILDING USES <br />The committee reviewed the overall concept of keeping a postal facility at the City Hall. It <br />was felt that the current postal facility in Crystal Bay served the adjacent residential <br />community and really wasn’t a significant postal resource for the exp^mded Orono <br />community. The committee asked staff to look further into options for the existence of that <br />postal facility if the City Hall was no longer there and the possibility of maintaining that <br />postal location for mail distribution regardless of the City Hall site and usage. A library was <br />discussed for the City Hall site. The current location on Highway 12 was discussed in <br />regard to it’s adjacency to that site for city hall/library accessibility. The potential to have <br />an overall campus of public service buildings (i.e. city hall, library, school) was felt to be a <br />service plus for the community. One committee member suggested that the building site <br />be large enough to have a central medical helicopter pad for emergency use. The <br />potential of a facility upus big enough to hold a fire station mentioned. The fire station <br />location was stated by the consultant to be dependent as much on location of potential <br />volunteers as well as adjacency for response time throughout the City of Orono. With this, <br />the committee understood that the fire station facility, if it wore to occur, would be a <br />separate type of need and should be independently studied for location. <br />In reviewing the overall types of spaces, the committee concensus was that the public <br />areas of the building (i.e. - council and mooting rooms) should be centrally located off of <br />an easily accessible lobby space. All of these rooms should be flexible and divisible for <br />easy community usage. The council area should be sot up such that smaller council <br />meetings will not use the whole room. For larger meetings the room could be opened up <br />as a larger area for seating. A central lunchroom, shared equipment, and service and <br />restroom facilities for both police and city hall, was felt to be appropriate. The cor^* ‘tee <br />liked the concept of having public works, city hall and police all on one site. Th:-- 3t <br />was favored by the committee to provide a central staff and service potential as <br />create any • ''onomies through shared usage. The committee also felt that the cnufOi <br />area and meeting center should bo set up to allow for cable television with proper <br />ventilation and acoustics for adequate meeting purposes.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.