My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-22-1990 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1990
>
10-22-1990 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/10/2025 11:17:13 AM
Creation date
2/10/2025 11:15:22 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
448
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
unanimous in their recommendation pertaining to the site. <br />ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 24, 1990 <br />CITY FACILITIES CONTINUED <br />Gretchen Menzel confirmed that at least 70% of the Citizen's <br />Group agreed to the site recommended. <br />Jabbour explained that the Group was told that 70% consensus <br />was required in order to proceed forward. He said, "During our <br />voting procedure, that is what we had in mind." <br />Peterson explained that she was not referring to the <br />recommendation regarding the site. She stated that the Citizen's <br />Group should meet to discuss the specs and plans now that a site <br />nas been selected. <br />Mayor Grabek stated that it is premature in the process to <br />discuss specs and plans. <br />Gabriel Jabbour said, "In my opinion, the Citizen's Group <br />proceeded as far as we could without having information <br />pertaining to a particular site. Once we know that information, <br />we can proceed forward to make ether determinations regarding the <br />structure itself." <br />It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Nettles, to <br />schedule a public meeting regarding the City Facilities for the <br />October 22nd Council meeting. At that meeting Council can opt to <br />vote on the Highway 12 site, or table action for another four <br />months. The Citizen's Group should attend that meeting. Motion, <br />.Ayes-3, Goetten, Nay. .Motion passed. Goetten indicated that she <br />preferred to delay the public meeting until November. <br />Bernhardson asked if it would be appropriate to use the <br />Mayor's Article as a method of notifying the public about this <br />issue. <br />Goetten suggested that a regular article in the paper would <br />suffice. <br />Mayor Grabek stated that notification should be given in the <br />manner that other Council Agenda iters are made public. <br />COflPREHENSIVE^PLAN RESPONSES <br />BernhardsoTk^resented information^egarding proposed changes <br />in response to Meti^i^ouncil's transportation and sewer chapters. <br />He suggested waiting^<o respond until more is known about the <br />Highway 12 Corridor. H^^v^id, "There are areas that have been <br />sewered but not included inth^current plan and we would provide <br />that information in our respons^Vv^We would present the response <br />to the Planning Commission at their Oct^er, 1990 meeting. <br />Council accepted the information presented by <br />and took no formal action. " <br />Bernhardson <br />- 15 -
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.