Laserfiche WebLink
Water Structures and Environment Committee October 13, 1990 <br />Reese noted that as a commercial marina, Chapman Place does <br />not have adequate parking, and does not provide public amenities. <br />(It is grandfathered for 27 slips rather than licensed for <br />special density requiring amenities) <br />Cochran stated that in looking at what the District is <br />trying to accomplish, this arrangement provides a benefit to the <br />general public, as well as the owners of the condominiums. He <br />can foresee the need for some adjustment to the ordinances, <br />noting a similar situation exists at the Excelsior Bay Gables. <br />Slocum said he was satisfied with Cuthill’s responses to the <br />LeFevere letter, his opinion being that Chapman Place has done <br />what the LMCD required in its order. <br />Slocum moved, Pillsbury seconded, to dismiss this discussion <br />and to consider an ordinance change to allow ownership of docks <br />with an arms length operating agreement. <br />Reese moved, Hurr seconded, to table the discu.ssion unti) <br />the matter of the Chapman Place docks and the Excelsior Pay <br />Gables docks can be discussed in the same context. Motion <br />carried, Slocum voting nay. Cuthili advised the committee that <br />Chapman Place was prepared to sign an operators agreement for <br />1991 at an early date. The committee offered no objection to <br />their doing so. <br />2- Communication with Lakeside Marina Regarding Non-Compliance <br />The Executive Director reported that Jim Dunn, Lakeside <br />Marina owner, has not complied with the temporary low water <br />variance granted in April. He was allowed to replace permanent <br />docks with floating docks in the same configuration, extended to <br />600’. The change is only half completed. Slip sices do not <br />conform to the original configuration. <br />The Executive Director recommends putting Dunn on notice <br />that the District expects Lakeside Marina to have docks in place-' <br />in the exact configuration, supported by an as-built survey. The <br />docks are otherwise not to be used until a license is issued. <br />Cochran moved, Pillsbury seconded, to recommend acceptance <br />of the Executive D-rector’s recommendation and to autJiorise him <br />to communicate the plan he has outlined to the licensee. Motion <br />carried unanimously. <br />3. Review of Amenity Study <br />The committee received an update of the Amenity Value Study <br />dated October 5, 1990. <br />Hurr moved, Rascop seconded, to recommend approval of Uie <br />amendment to Code 2.05, Subd. 4 as submitted with the following <br />changes: <br />Group A - Title Change: Public Access: Handicr^pped Access <br />Meeting State Standards for Docks and Boats, and Adequate General <br />Public Parking are Mandatory Requirements for one or more of the <br />following: <br />Group C - Item n): Slip and/or boat use for ^m<^rgen::ies and <br />governm^ntJiJL axe.ncLy us^ ~ continu»;d