Laserfiche WebLink
Page 5, step 2, parts c and d. "Establish t Shoreland Development data <br />base...." <br />These steps are best completed by the cities as part of the <br />development of their individual shore.’and ordinance. <br />Page 7, step 4. "Specific policy areas...." <br />Some policy areas that are listed could not be addressed by the LMCL <br />without intruding on the individual city's traditional <br />jurisdictions. The LMCD should not put itself in the position of <br />telling the 14 cities what land uses and zoning classes are <br />appropriate within their municipal boundaries. The LMCD should <br />continue to focus its attention on what impact those uses and zoning <br />classes will have on the lake. The LMCD's objective is to protect the <br />lake, not establish land uses around the lake. <br />Page 9, step 5. "Develop a Regional Lakewide Development Framework...." <br />This is to develop a generalized plan for the type of development that <br />should be allowed within each city. We did some of that during the <br />subcommittee work -- insofar as it was needed and appropriate. Beyond <br />that, we feel this intrudes too much into the individual city's <br />traditiv^nal jurisdiction. Our goal of protecting the lake from <br />pollution can be accomplished without this step. Further, the LMCD <br />performing this step is sure to alienate most of the cities on the <br />lake. It simply is unnecessary for the LMCD given its lack of <br />jurisdiction in this area. <br />Page 9, step 6. "Develop an Implementation Program...." <br />The Shoreland Subcommittee determined, as the DNR did, that the <br />program should be implemented by the individual cities that have the <br />sole and exclusive authority in this area. Specific details on how <br />this program is implemented within each city need not involve the <br />LMCD. Once an ordinance is developed that indeed protects the lake, <br />the LMCD need be concerned only that the ordinance is enforced.