My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 5421
Orono
>
Resolutions, Ordinances, Proclamations
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7399
>
Reso 5400 - 5499 (November 28, 2005 - August 28, 2006)
>
Resolution 5421
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/5/2015 12:20:00 PM
Creation date
11/5/2015 12:19:59 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />RESOLUTION ENPIRED I <br />CITY of ORONO, <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO. 5421 <br />A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE <br />PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT <br />3500 WATERTOWN ROAD <br />FILE NO. 05-3152 <br />WHEREAS, Bohland Development Inc. (hereinafter the "Developer") has an <br />interest in the property within the City of Orono (hereinafter the "City") located at 3500 <br />Watertown Road and legally described as follows: <br />Outlot A, Kintyre, Hennepin County, Minnesota <br />(hereinafter the "Property"); and <br />WHEREAS, on August 17, 2005 the Developer filed an incomplete subdivision <br />application with the City for preliminary approval of a six lot residential plat of the Property; and <br />WHEREAS, after due published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota <br />Statutes 462.358 et. seq. and the City of Orono Zoning and Subdivision Codes, the Orono <br />Planning Commission held a public hearing for the application and reviewed it as a sketch plan <br />on September 19, 2005, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this <br />application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and <br />WHEREAS, on September 19, 2005 the Planning Commission recommended a <br />number of revisions to the proposal including that it be processed as a Planned Residential <br />Development (PRD); and <br />WHEREAS, the applicant submitted a revised sketch plan proposal which was <br />reviewed by the Planning Commission at a public hearing held on October 17, 2005, at which <br />time the Planning Commission recommended that the amended application be forwarded to the <br />City Council for confirmation that the PRD process was acceptable; and <br />WHEREAS, at its regular meeting of October 24, 2005. the City Council <br />reviewed the sketch plan and indicated that the PRD process would be acceptable, subject to the <br />applicant addressing the City's Conservation Design goals and objectives, and subject to careful <br />review that all standards necessary to ensure a successful development are met; and <br />Page 1 of 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.