Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File 1579 <br />September 17, 1990 <br />Page 2 <br />Planning Commission did not consider the average lakeshore <br />setback encroachment a significant issue because no neighboring <br />property owners views of the lake are diminished. Planning <br />Commission recommended that the decks be cut back to the pre­ <br />existing 18' X 13' dimension. <br />The miniority Planning Commission opinion (Commissioner <br />Rowlette) was that the required deck removals should not be as <br />extensive as recommended by the majority. <br />Note that applicants were scheduled for a court appearance <br />regarding the violation tag, on September 19, 1990. No word on <br />the results has been received as of this writing. <br />Staff Recommendation <br />Staff would concur with the Planning Commission <br />recommendation. Because the Planning Commission recommendation <br />is essentially for a full denial of the variance request, with <br />restoration, staff has not drafted a resolution pending Council's <br />conceptual action. <br />Council has the following options: <br />1. Direct staff to draft a resolution for denial, for <br />adoption at your next meeting. <br />2. Conceptually grant partial approval, directing staff to <br />draft a resolution reflecting your action. <br />3. Conceptually approve the decks as constructed, <br />directing staff to draft a resolution of approval. <br />4.Otner. <br />^ mV