Laserfiche WebLink
MiNUTBS OF THE STUBBS BAY SEWER HEARING - NOVEMBER 20, 1991 <br />resulted in a feasibility study for the area. <br />Gaffron stated that in 1990 a proposal was sent to affected <br />properties owners that suggested the City would install a trunk <br />and lateral system that would divide the cost of the trunk system <br />up equally by the number of total units and would price out the <br />lateral system to serve each area individually. The Council at <br />the time noted to the residents that those who waive their right <br />to appeal would have the whole amount assessed over 15 years <br />rather than charging lateral costs as a connection charge. He <br />noted plan that did not gain much favor with affected residents. <br />Gaffron explained that in late 1990, a few citizens from the area <br />who were in favor of the sewer project. proposed to the Council <br />establishment of a committee to work towards the installation of <br />sewer in the area. That Committee reported that the residents <br />felt the cost was too much, but that it was also needed. <br />Gaffron went on to explain how both a trench and mound septic <br />system work. He explained that studies show that a 36" <br />separation between the highest seasonal water table from the <br />bottom of the trench system is required for proper functioning. <br />He stated that a mound system will make allowances by forming an <br />artificial system of unsaturated area. Gaffron noted that the <br />Stubbs Bay area has high water tables. He noted that when <br />reviewing the soils map, much of Stubbs Bay would need a mound <br />system or the map indicated no system would function in the soil <br />conditions. Gaffron indicated that Oxford Road does note better <br />soil conditions, unfortunately it has been found that the maps <br />are not always right and man, of these propet Lies would probably <br />still require mound systems. <br />Gaffron pointed out that nutrients in the effluent must be <br />properly treated. Phosphorus, goes into the ground and adsorbs <br />onto soil particles. When all the nearby soil particles have <br />adsorbed as much as they can, the phosphorus moves further away <br />from the system, which may cause phosphorus accumulations <br />reaching the lake eventually. Another concern is nitrates, which <br />start In an ammonia form, which are soluble, and move with the <br />ground water. He stated that they may be a problem with private <br />water supplies. Biological concerns and viruses are other <br />concerns but do not generally affect Orono's lakes or water <br />supplies partially because of the clay soil present in the area. <br />Gaffron noted that th'""® are State and local code requirements <br />for septic systems: 75' from the lake; 10’ from property lines; <br />10' from buildings and driveways, Orono requires 20’; 50' from <br />wells, Orono requires 75'; and 3' above the seasonal watertable <br />in order to keep the biomat degrading so water continues to move <br />through it. However, he noted that codes have changed and <br />continue to do so, and therefore c'^der systems woula net meet <br />current standards.