Laserfiche WebLink
P-., <br />%:■ <br />■i-;: <br />MINUTil Of THI STUMS iAY SCWER HEARING - NOVEMBER 20. 1991 <br />Gaffron Indicated that If the lot were aoprovQfi to be split in <br />half now, h« would be assessed for 2 units. He reviewed that Mr, <br />Cran# Is suggesting that anyone with the ability to subdivide <br />should get assessed for those possible future lots. He noted <br />that Hr. Burger Is the only owner with property that has the <br />ability to subdivide under current zoning. <br />Oaan Moline, <br />Cygnet with <br />each. <br />248 Cygnet Place, stressed that there are 2 ^ots on <br />2 acres and therefore should be assessed 2 units <br />Gaffron noted that In both cases. one lot Is vacant and used by <br />the principal residence and therefore only assessed one unit. <br />Moline felt that the project was bad timing as the Highway 12 <br />corridor has not yet been determined, which may run r1g*-‘ ‘‘hrough <br />his lot If the southern corridor Is picked. <br />Behrman noted that they do not even have an opportunity ^ ell <br />their property because the highway issue has buye s scared off. <br />Doug Merz, 3195 Watertown Road. stated that he had a failing <br />and Just recently put in a mound system at the cost of <br />$10,000. He noted he Is for for the sewer but not at that cost. <br />He asked about the status of the subdivision of the Panuska <br />property. <br />Gaffron stated that the subdivider. Mr. Carlson had a problem <br />with the Army Corp of Engineers, which is still being worked out. <br />The preliminary plat approval is about to expire and Carlson will <br />either have to apply for an extension or refile a new plat. <br />Crane stated he was surprised to see his property was Included as <br />the original study did not Include property north of the Luce <br />Line. Me felt that because residents asked the dollar amount to <br />be reduced, the City Included this area. He stated that <br />according to the handout. laterals to his property will not even <br />be installed Immediately, but those properties will be assessed <br />Immediately for the project. <br />Gaffron noted that only areas with laterals Installed Immediately <br />would be assessed for those laterals. <br />Crane reviewed that his property does not need the sewer, but was <br />Included to reduce the trunk portion of the cost for other. He <br />felt there was no way his property would benefit $19,000 for the <br />Installation of sewer. He felt that the total cost of the <br />project sho d be divided equally which would put the cost at <br />about $14,50u ' everyone. He thought it interesting ^hat areas <br />that need tht, sewer the most have the lowest cost for the <br />project. <br />Rowlette explained that is not why the cost of others went down.