My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-20-1991 Stubbs Bay Sewer Hearing Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
1991
>
11-20-1991 Stubbs Bay Sewer Hearing Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/24/2025 11:12:02 AM
Creation date
1/24/2025 11:11:57 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
I <br />I:i: <br />f <br />iK <br />MiNuril Of THi aruiis oay sewer hearing - November 20, 1991 <br />look closely at the criteria for being Involved in the project. <br />He wanted the lateral to be run down the street to avoid tree <br />loss. <br />Cook noted tiat could be done. <br />Klltzke noted that all Oxford residents oppose the project. He <br />felt there was no need to fix a problem that doesn't exist. He <br />felt that these not meeting the restrictions of the ordinance <br />should be forced to do so. <br />Goetten noted that the City has hired a septic Inspector who will <br />be Involved with these Issues. She noted the City does follow up <br />on complaints by neighbors regarding septic problems. <br />Klltzke felt that was good and the citizens needed that kind of <br />support. He noted the long-term fix can be expensive. <br />Jebbour explained that Oxford Road and Cygnet Place came In at <br />the end of the study, and he would need further clarification <br />from staff that the areas need sewer before he would vote for it <br />In those areas. <br />Goetten noted that Oxford Road was Included because the lets are <br />on lakeshore. She too concurred with Jabbour regarding the need <br />for sewer In this area. <br />Arnie Robins. 3211 Bayside Road, agreed with the Oxford Road <br />residents. He noted that he has a 3-year old house and wanted to <br />know why Fox Bend plat and the church weren’t Included. <br />Goetten explained the Council has considered criteria for <br />incluslon/exclusIon. <br />Terl Robins felt that Fox Bend should be assessed for possible <br />future hookup. <br />Butler noted they won't get the benefit of the project. <br />Robins noted that because they were putting In miles of pipe, <br />they may as well benefit and they should have to pay. <br />Jabbour noted he had a hard time requiring a new development that <br />has been required to provide for primary and alternate septic <br />testing to also bo required to hook up to sewer. He noted that <br />If they are to hook up at a later date, they will have to pay for <br />It at that time. <br />Klltzke noted that about 40 homes will not Increase <br />amount of the assessment, and this concern needs to <br />He felt that the Council needs to decide how to <br />project and doesn't feel that how it was done in <br />necessarily the best way to go about it now. <br />In value the <br />be addressed. <br />finance the <br />the past 1s <br />T. Robins asked what outside funds have been looked at.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.