My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-24-1990 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1990
>
09-24-1990 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2025 1:26:24 PM
Creation date
1/21/2025 1:24:31 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
444
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
between 10:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. weekends and holidays. <br />At other densities it has added stronger language about <br />additional patrol hours which is in addition to language <br />on page viii that state that unless 3,000 additional <br />patrol hours are available by the 7.0 density, no <br />further access growth will allowed. <br />Revised draft still does not accomplish the following: <br />Density Monitoring - The plan does not specify the <br />methodology or the frequency for determining density <br />as part of the body of the agreement or reference to <br />another document that would contain it. <br />Access Control Model - While the document does <br />address both storage potential and actual access use <br />they have not pulled the two together nor predict as <br />part of their model potential growth from any <br />particular access growth. (Attachment D is an <br />attempt at that, to see if that is helpful.) It is <br />interesting to note, based on the very rudimentary <br />information that generally based on use during survey <br />densities to storage counts are roughly: <br />Public ramped access is 1-1 to 1-2 (350 or 700 <br />slots) <br />Marinas - 1 used for every 5 slips <br />' Lakeshore owners - 1 used for every 10 boats <br />stored <br />Assuming little or no growth in marinas/yacht clubs, <br />municipal access or homeowners association, the <br />growth potential is primarily from ramp access and <br />single family homeowners. For homeowners it*s a <br />growth either: <br />a. ) further subdivisions <br />b. ) more boats/limit (current about 2/lot) <br />c. ) "increase" in the ration of storage to use <br />from 10-1 to 8-1 etc. <br />(The categories used were in the definitions section <br />which were from a DNR study and the ratios reflect <br />the use to the storage count.) <br />Pub lie Safety - They modified language to indicating <br />that they presently do not have their own police force, <br />but may do so in the future. Additionally they <br />referred to the communications problems as a technical <br />issue. The problem with radio communications between <br />the surrounding cities and the Water Patrol Is an issue <br />of policy of the Sheriff's department rather than <br />technology, although technology could possibly resolve <br />it.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.