Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF ORONO COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 26, 1990 <br />Mr. Bichanich when the contracts will be paid in full? Mr. <br />Bichanich replied that one contract will be paid in April, the <br />other in 5 years. Gaffron suggested placing that infoi^ation in <br />the City's tickler file. Peterson asked whether Mr. Bichanich <br />wo!ld Assessed foe two sewer units when available? Gaffron <br />said that issue has not been addressed. Gaffron suggested t^at <br />it be indicated that the lot with the principal structure would <br />be Lsi^ned a unit, the other lot would not. He said that would <br />be a tool to encourage that the lots be combined. He said, <br />however, if someone attempts to build on the other lot, they <br />should be charged for a sewer unit. CounciImerabet Nettles amended <br />his motion to address chat issue in the resolution. Acting Mayor <br />Callahan seconded. Motion, Ayes-4, Nays-0, Motion passed. <br />#1470 DAN & RUTH PARTEN <br />4300 BAYSIDE ROAD <br />SUBDIVISION <br />Mr. Par ten was present for this matter. <br />city AdministraLor Bernhardson provided a brief history and <br />explanation of this application. Bernhardson said that he had <br />met with Mr. Parten today to discuss <br />An issue that concerns Mr. Patten is the point at whicn tn <br />"nrivate driveway" would be upgraded with hard surface. He and <br />Mr parten^ dVscufLd the long tirn. goal being the possible future_ <br />ne;<J fora north/south road. There could, perhaps be a delay of <br />Spgraiing t^rprivate road until such time that a third lot we^re <br />to^develop or a permanent public road to the south is completed. <br />Mr. Partfn has indicated that he would like ti proceed with the <br />Planning Commission's recommendation. <br />Gaffron reviewed the Planning Commission's recommendations. <br />Gaffron said that the north/south driveway access is being <br />conLgured as shown because the Planning Commission did not want <br />Lot 2 to be a flag lot. <br />counci imember Goetten asked Gaf: whe^-^ the 50' road <br />corridor referred to in his memo would b*= -ocatec <br />Gaffron said that based on the discussion at the previous <br />council meeting, the City may wish to have a corridor extending <br />extended further north. <br />Goetten asked whether Mr. Parten would .*'a''.'^ ad^fte land <br />for three 5-acre lots if the 50' corridor is included in th. <br />plat? <br />r;,ffrnn reolied that if both the 50' outlets along the east <br />boundary and I SO* outlet along the existing ^“''®^Yaable <br />included it would have an impact on f-e amount of dry buildabi . <br />land available.