Laserfiche WebLink
'crORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MAY 21, 1990 <br />*1 CONSTRUCTION CONTINUED <br />Lit for -.he Planning Commission to meet before obtaining- <br />permit. <br />f-vnat- and City staff have attempted <br />Mr. Kost said would provide staff with tht. <br />establish obDective a "’oroposal is^acceotable. He statedtt stinS" ».=».,« «, <br />locLiL of trees and other factors unique to eacn lo.. <br />Kelley believed that “I’Vy Vaid^Lat'in his <br />Change t'Le "ruies of the game” at tnis point. <br />with iL'^tlndS'estabLs'hel: 1:!“^LbdTvisIon \“pro^'a2 ' <br />1-ha*- -he Citv and the Developer have Mr. Kost said tha^ oarticularly in <br />interpreted some of the do not <br />regard to the cur for the driveway. Mr. <br />Specif'^ that r.here be under lot, it is likely <br />Kist said that Vl° ced at th^SO ■ setback line. If the <br />that tne house wi.. P setback line, omy a 20 <br />house IS placec at the fr Y , ^^1 not adequate.y <br />driveway will be allowed. A 20 criv.wa, <br />serve a three-car garage. <br />those <br />that <br />situations, <br />will take <br />It will be <br />that intoBellows reiterated tha-c in <br />necessary to design a house <br />consideration. <br />,, . Knst if ^'e would like to continue to v;ork <br />Kiir.= «'“ =“• -•»*' <br />Johnson questioned whether ®^locat the <br />force the builder ^ additional driveway area. He <br />^L^LL-d \“h;\ La-L-LL: ifa^LeVative impact on the lot, <br />than allowing a loop driveway. <br />Bellows said that is the *^^deve\oper is <br />^seLtiLlly^askin^fL’^h variance from the original standards and <br />thirLriances require Planning Commission review. <br />It was the consensus Of the Planning^commi^^^^^^^^ <br />be no amendment to ^ ^ comply with the standards set <br />- 18 -