My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-23-1998 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1998
>
03-23-1998 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2025 12:32:39 PM
Creation date
1/14/2025 12:30:37 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
516
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO Cl'n COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON NLVRCH 9» 1998 <br />(#11 - #2341 Daniel J. Anderson - Continued) <br />> <br />Kelley said he is in favor of maintaining the vegetation to the extent that the City design <br />the access of the individual homes on Lots 5 and 6 for obtaining access down to the lake. <br />He would like to see t^ * bluff impact zone roped off <br />Goetten noted an example of where vegetation has been cut dowTi entirely by a resident. <br />Jabbour indicated that erosion of 2’ per year has occurred in the area where the clear <br />cutting happened. <br />Anderson said he believed the property owners have the right to get to the lakeshore but <br />agreed that this issue requires monitoring. <br />Jabbour asked what agency gets involved with dredging Gaffron said the DNR, Corp of <br />Engineers, and Watershed District are notified. He indicated the problem arises with <br />these agencies having little say in historic dredging. <br />Jabbour asked if the had the power to locate docks. Gaffron said there are no <br />standards in the code but the City has the ability through an easement to limit cutting <br />through trees. Barrett said the City has the powc ' do as Jabbour noted but may not <br />have oone so in the past. He indicated the City hi :he right to control the land to the <br />shorelir , and the dock must touch the shoreline. der'^on noted that there is 60' of <br />wetlands on Lot 6 requiring the dock to be placec closer to Lot 5. <br />Goetten was informed by Flint that if the trail easement was taken on the property and <br />the trail not developed on that side of the road, the City could not go back and ask for a <br />cash contribution to park dedication Flint reported that the Park Commission has <br />reviewed the trail extensively for location on the east side to an area north of the Luce <br />Line. The trail south of the Luce Line is difficult due to houses being so close to the <br />road. Goetten said she thought the trail location has already been reviewed and <br />determined <br />McDermott reported that the trail was reviewed recently on the site He indicated there <br />are problems areas on both sides of the road. It was already agreed that the trail would <br />•: % located on the east side with a dedicated trail except for one piece of property on the <br />'A>uthwest corner across from French Creek where the regional park can be accessed. <br />There are difficult topographical areas for grading on the west side of the road requiring <br />major retaining walls McDermott noted where the trail location and crossing was being <br />considered <br />Jabbour questioned why the road crossing does not occur where the site lines are best. <br />Anderson indicated that cars drive fast around the road where it comers and would be an <br />unsafe area for the trail to cross. Jabbour suggested the trail crossing be at the stop sign.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.