03-23-1998 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON MARCH 9,1998 (#7 -1^2327 Orono Development Ordinance Amendment - Continued) Kelley commented that some bagel shops are actually restaurants He asked if this use could be allowed in the B-5 district Gaffron said, while the bagel use will include some sit-down seating, it is not specifically defined as a Class 1 or 11 restaurant. Jabbour said his concern would be that the use would grow into something that does not fit their understanding. Gaffron said the placement of conditions can control that from occurring. Kelley noted that many of the bagel shops include fiill menus, while others only sell bagels. He would like to see a clear definition of what is being considered He asked Council to consider how intense the use should be. Jabbour said if the Council feels the sit-down use is appropriate, it should not be confused with a full-fledged restaurant, which he views differently. Gaffron said his vision for this use is a 2000-4000 s f shop similar to a Caribou Coffee He said the Council should revisit the issue if they art: not comfortable with it as presented. Jabbour said he was supportive of the req tested uses with a limited space allotment. He noted that these restrictions are sometimes pushed to their limits and sees the need to oocument the Council's intent for amending the code. Gaffron commented that there was a relatively strong possibility that someone could make an application that would stretch the limits of the amendment. He questioned where the City will draw the line when a slightly different type of use is requested. Jabbour supported applicant's right to request an amendment but would like to see controls in place that limit the use. Goetten agreed with Jabbour. Peterson questioned whether the use could be confined to only the coffee and bagel use. Jabbour felt the size of the establishment would limit the use. Goetten asked if more detail is required. Kelley said he would support the use with no seating. He felt adding seating would •''Hange the use. Goetten countered that coffee shops usually having some seating. Kelley asked if the use should be in the B-1 district. Jabbour said a full-fledged restaurant could be built in that district. Gaffron concurred that the B-1 allows for both Class I and II restaurants. Jabbour felt if the use was a conditional use as proposed with documentation and history behind the amendment, the City would have more protection '* ^m misuse Kelley said he would agree with Goetten regarding the need for some seating but would like the seating limited in number. Goetten felt this request was reasonable. Peterson agreed. Gaffron noted when considering the square footage limitation and the likelihood that half of the space would be for a work station, there would typically be about a 30’x30' section available for seating for an individual bagel or coffee use.