Laserfiche WebLink
CITY OF ORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ANALYSIS: <br />The City Council may approve a CUP for the walls are: construction of retaining walls as long as the <br />B1. Designed to correct an established erosion problem; the applicant indicated that the <br />new walls are necessary to provide stability at the base of the bluff1ust above the rip <br />rap. They assert that the use of the wall will avoid the need to grade further inland to <br />create stability. The Applicant has provided a landscape plan for the slope which <br />includes deep-rooted plants and shrubs in addition to the proposed walls. This <br />criterion has been met; and <br />82. Suitable given the demonstrated need; A global stability analysis by Ronald W. <br />Vickery, PE was provided, The analysis notes a retaining wall would improve the <br />stability of the bluff. This criterion has been met; and <br />B3. Designed by a registered engineer or landscape architect, depending on the project <br />scope; the Applicant has provided a revised retaining wall design from a registered <br />engineer which matches the submitted plans. This criterion has been met; and <br />B4. Designed to be the minimum size necessary to control the erosion problem. The <br />engineers revised analysis indicated that the Applicant's revised plan was necessary <br />to stabilize the bluff. The wall plan has been changed/iessened from the original <br />proposal and beneficial vegetation has been proposed to supplement new walls <br />within the shore setback. This criterion has been met. <br />Based on the application and the evidence submitted, the Council finds that the proposed use <br />at the prapased location is or will be: <br />B5. Consistent with the community management plan; the applicant has provided a <br />landscape plan which, when matured, should offer sufficient screening of the lake <br />access stairs and walls. This criterion is met. <br />B6. Compliant with the zoning code, including any conditions impaled on specific uses as <br />required by article V, division 3 of the Ci#y Cade; retaining walls within the lakeyard are <br />permitted where they are deemed necessary to protect the integrity of the slope. The <br />Applicant and the Applicant's engineer have provided information showing that the <br />installation of walls is the most effective and minimal necessary to achieve the desired <br />stability. This criterion is met. <br />