My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-08-1990 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
1990-1996 Microfilm
>
1990
>
01-08-1990 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/17/2024 2:18:12 PM
Creation date
12/17/2024 2:15:48 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
373
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OP THE ORONO COUNCIL MEETING OP DECEMBER 11, 1989 <br />ZONING PILE #1289-WILL CONTINUED r . , <br />plans to provide an access corridor along the north side of xiOt i <br />to serve Lot 2 as originally indicated. At the Planning <br />Commission Meeting, the applicant revised his proposal to locate <br />the access corridor along the south side. Mabusth said that <br />additional septic testing will be necessary if the access <br />corridor is to be located along the northern boundary. Mabusth <br />said that the location of the cul-de-sac should be left to <br />staff's determination so that elevations, plantings and the <br />location of the septic site on the far eastern lot can be taxen <br />into consideration. She said that the road cannot encroach <br />within 20' of the septic test site. <br />Mabusth asked Mr. Will to indicate his preference of the <br />location of the driveway outlot. <br />Mr. Will said that the real preference is to locate it on <br />the north side of the property. He said that if the cul-de-sac <br />is moved further north, the outlot should be along the northern <br />border. Mr. Will said that there are less trees in that area as <br />opposed to the south side. <br />Mayor Grabek asked how access to the north would be achieved <br />if the cul-de-sac is located in a more southerly location? <br />Mabusth asked City Engineer Cook to respond to that <br />question. <br />Cook said that a driveway could be constructed between the <br />cul-de-sac and the northern outlot? He said that the cost to the <br />property owner will increase the further the City vxtends the <br />road. Cook said if the City does extend the ro. along the <br />street right-of-way it should be constructed to City standards. <br />Mabusth said that as part of this application, the Council <br />is being asked to approve Wear Lane North as a public roadway. <br />She said that the Planning Commission has recommended public <br />maintenance of the road if it is to be dedicated to the public. <br />Planning Commission Representative Brown commented that the <br />Planning Commission recommended public maintenance because it was <br />their feeling that the road would not otherwise be maintained. <br />Mayor Grabek asked what made this different from other <br />private roads. <br />Mabusth replied that the cost factor set for each unit by <br />the current owner of the subdivision on whicn Wear Lane North is <br />presently located is $20,000.00 and that is prohibitive to Mr. <br />Will. <br />CounciImember Goetten expressed her concern for the need to <br />address the issue of private vs. public roads. She questioned <br />whether a precedent would be set by making this a public road to <br />be maintained publicly.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.