My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 7545 Conditional Use Permit 755 Tonkawa Rd
Orono
>
Resolutions, Ordinances, Proclamations
>
Resolutions
>
Resolution 7545 Conditional Use Permit 755 Tonkawa Rd
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/22/2025 9:51:43 AM
Creation date
12/10/2024 3:39:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address
House Number
755
Street Name
Tonkawa
Street Type
Road
Address
755 Tonkawa Rd
Document Type
Resolutions
Permit Number
LA24-000060
PIN
0511723330003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4�ON0 CITY OF ORONO <br /> RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> NO.7545 <br /> lI' SHO <br /> A4. The Property is within Tier 1 and hardcover is limited to 25% according to the <br /> Stormwater Quality Overlay District. The Applicant proposes 17.6% total site hardcover. <br /> A5. The Applicant requests a conditional use permit to construct new and replacement <br /> retaining walls as a part of a deck replacement within the lakeshore setback. <br /> A6. In considering this application for a conditional use permit, the Council has considered <br /> the advice and recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the <br /> proposed conditional use permit upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, <br /> existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public <br /> safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. <br /> CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ANALYSIS: <br /> The City Council may approve a conditional use permit for the construction of retaining walls <br /> as long as the walls are: <br /> B1. Designed to correct an established erosion problem; The proposed retaining walls are <br /> replacing existing walls in poor condition, that have provided slope stability for the site <br /> and facilitated lake access for several decades. This criterion is met; and <br /> B2. Suitable given the demonstrated need; The proposed retaining walls are found to be <br /> suitable in comparison to the existing retaining walls in terms of providing slope stability <br /> and erosion control. This criterion is met; and <br /> B3. Designed by a registered engineer or landscape architect, depending on the project <br /> scope; The proposed retaining walls were designed by licensed landscape architects. <br /> This criterion is met; and <br /> B4. Designed to be the minimum size necessary to control the erosion problem; The <br /> proposed retaining walls are designed to reduce hardcover in the 75'lakeshore <br /> setback, overall wall height, and the width of the proposed deck. This criterion is met. <br /> Based on the application and the evidence submitted, the Council finds that the proposed use <br /> at the proposed location is or will be: <br /> B5. Consistent with the community management plan; the new deck and retaining wall will <br /> reduce the visual massing of improvements along the lakefront and the hardcover <br /> within the 75'lakeshore setback will decrease, aspects that are consistent with the <br /> Comprehensive Plan; and <br /> B6. Compliant with the zoning code, including any conditions imposed on specific uses as <br /> required by article V, division 3 of the City Code; retaining walls within the lakeyard are <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.