Laserfiche WebLink
4�ON0 CITY OF ORONO <br /> RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> NO.7545 <br /> lI' SHO <br /> A4. The Property is within Tier 1 and hardcover is limited to 25% according to the <br /> Stormwater Quality Overlay District. The Applicant proposes 17.6% total site hardcover. <br /> A5. The Applicant requests a conditional use permit to construct new and replacement <br /> retaining walls as a part of a deck replacement within the lakeshore setback. <br /> A6. In considering this application for a conditional use permit, the Council has considered <br /> the advice and recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the <br /> proposed conditional use permit upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, <br /> existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public <br /> safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. <br /> CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ANALYSIS: <br /> The City Council may approve a conditional use permit for the construction of retaining walls <br /> as long as the walls are: <br /> B1. Designed to correct an established erosion problem; The proposed retaining walls are <br /> replacing existing walls in poor condition, that have provided slope stability for the site <br /> and facilitated lake access for several decades. This criterion is met; and <br /> B2. Suitable given the demonstrated need; The proposed retaining walls are found to be <br /> suitable in comparison to the existing retaining walls in terms of providing slope stability <br /> and erosion control. This criterion is met; and <br /> B3. Designed by a registered engineer or landscape architect, depending on the project <br /> scope; The proposed retaining walls were designed by licensed landscape architects. <br /> This criterion is met; and <br /> B4. Designed to be the minimum size necessary to control the erosion problem; The <br /> proposed retaining walls are designed to reduce hardcover in the 75'lakeshore <br /> setback, overall wall height, and the width of the proposed deck. This criterion is met. <br /> Based on the application and the evidence submitted, the Council finds that the proposed use <br /> at the proposed location is or will be: <br /> B5. Consistent with the community management plan; the new deck and retaining wall will <br /> reduce the visual massing of improvements along the lakefront and the hardcover <br /> within the 75'lakeshore setback will decrease, aspects that are consistent with the <br /> Comprehensive Plan; and <br /> B6. Compliant with the zoning code, including any conditions imposed on specific uses as <br /> required by article V, division 3 of the City Code; retaining walls within the lakeyard are <br /> 2 <br />