09-10-1990 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Zoning File 1493 September 6, 1990 Page 2 obviously placed in front of an average lakeshore setback line. Council stated a revised updated survey would be required before Council would act on the improvement plan. The applicant has filed a land alteration conditional use permit with the City ( 15/0). Review Exhibit E. An updated survey has been submitted. The applicant proposes three tiers of retaining walls and extensive cutting into the existing lakeshore banks to solve erosion problems within the lakeshore yard. Planning Commission tabled all action on this phase of the application based on the magnitude of the proposal and the fact that the improvement would be in complete conflict with previous actions of the City. In fact, Planning Commission pointed out specific areaoi where erosion was found and advised applicant to amend th^* proposal under the guidance of the Orono staff. Planning Commission further directed that the variance phase of the application could be acted on as there appeared to be no connection between the entry addition and the proposed land alterations within the lakeshore yard. The variance application is presented for Council's consideration and action. 1. Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 - After-the-fact average lakeshore setback variance for second story deck constructed sometime in 1982. Note the entire second story deck is located in front of the average lakeshore setback line. Planning Commission recommended approval of the after-the- fact variance. 2. Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 - Hardcover var unce review required because there already exists excessive amounts of hardcover over the allowed 25%. 75-250' Setback Aiea = 8,325 £ Existing Hardcover = 3,76 ’. or 45% per 1982 survey Existing Hardcover - 4,990.. .f. or 59.94% per 1990 survey (refer to Exhibits E & H) Proposed Herdcover * 3,979.3 s.f. or 47.7% (refer to Exhibit I) Removal of 1,. s.f. and addition of 30 s.f. (entry addition)