My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-10-1990 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1990
>
09-10-1990 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/10/2024 1:26:05 PM
Creation date
12/10/2024 1:24:17 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
450
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Til 12 Corridor Study <br />Policy Committee Minutes <br />* July 25, 1990 <br />Maple Plain City Hall <br />Approved August 22, 1990 <br />Members Present: <br />Alternates Present: <br />Others Present; <br />G. Wetter, M. Johnson, A. Kunze, M. Alger, G. Acromite, <br />D. Lorsung, R. Bauman, T. Humbert <br />K, Gabriel, M. Bemhardson <br />S. Hay, L. Dallam, R. Harris, R. Scheuer, P. Swanson, <br />A. Vande Vegte, G. Johnson <br />S. Hay called the meeting to order shortly after 5:00 p.m There were no changes made to the <br />agenda. Hay discussed roles and membership of the three TH 12 Committees and their <br />continued evolution. He also discussed an approach to conduct future meetings that would focus <br />primary interaction with committee members seated at the table, with input from their alternates <br />sealed in the audience. Others (citizens, technical committee rr.embers, etc.) attending the <br />meeting would be able to have issues/concerns addressed at the "Other Business" item of the <br />agenda. Ensuing discussion; <br />- Process to be used to ensure that compromises made by committee members will be <br />equitably treated? <br />- Who has authority to select corridors? <br />Hay stated that the purpose behind the scoping process was to narrow the range of possible <br />corridors, from input by all project participants, to a manageable and feasible number. <br />L. Dallam added that these feasible comdors would be addressed in an environmental impact <br />statement (EIS), along with the issues, concerns and impacts identified in the scoping process. <br />Dallam then presented the schedule of activities. He said it woulj b ielpful if a preferred <br />corridor was selected by July 1991 so that the corridor could be piotected and uncertainty in the <br />community removed. He said it would also be helpful to discuss the project with key people <br />in each city - and requested each member tc 'm1 or phone a list to him as soon as possible. <br />Questions followed, addre^^ed by Hay and D <br />- G. Acromite asced whether the schedule ot awuvities was for the Policy Committee or the <br />entire study. <br />Reply : Entire study.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.