My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-10-1990 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1990
>
09-10-1990 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/10/2024 1:26:05 PM
Creation date
12/10/2024 1:24:17 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
450
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
A RESOLUTION GRANTING <br />A VARIANCE TO <br />MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE <br />SECTION 10.28, SUBDIVISION 5 (B) <br />FILE 1578 <br />WHEREAS, A1 and Libbie Hopwood (hereinafter "the <br />applicants") are owners of the property located at 1205 Lakeview <br />Avenue within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally <br />described as follows: <br />Lots 12 and 13, Block 1, Maxwell's Addition to Crystal Bay, Lake <br />Minnetonka, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the <br />propertv"); and <br />WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for a <br />variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.28, Subdi'^iaion 5 (B) to <br />permit the construction of a deck to be located 27' from the street <br />lot line and 23' from the side street lot line v;here a l»( ' setback is <br />required from both lot lines. <br />Minnesota : <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, <br />I'^NDINGS <br />1. This applies <br />2, The propert <br />Residential Zonii <br />•».s . ewed as Zoning File 1578. <br />.ocated in the RR-lB Single Family Rural <br />strict. <br />3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on <br />August 20, 1990, and on a vote of 5 to 0 recommended approval of <br />the proposed variance based upon the foll;i.<'.ng findings: <br />a) The orientation of the house on this corner lot and the <br />size of the lot are hardi.>ips to the property which would <br />limit construction within the area of the house proposed for <br />the deck. <br />b) No neighboring properties w <br />construction of the proposed deck witn <br />work below extending to grade. <br />Page 1 of 4 <br />I be impacted by <br />iling and lattice
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.