Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #1573 September 6, 1990 Page 6 <br />The Planning Commission reaffirmed staff's findings <br />regarding the issue of required lot width at specific setback <br />areas. The Code specifically asks thit the required lot width be <br />met at the rear of the front yard setback line and at the 75' <br />setback mark, but does not state that this width must be <br />maintained throughout the entire building envelope. As proposed. <br />Lot 2 does not meet the required 100' width throughout the entire <br />b ding envelope (from 75' to rear of front yard setback line) <br />th. - no side setback variances will be granted at a future date. <br />The new subdivision filed as of July 26, 1990 is subject to <br />the reo ’ii^'ements of the new Park Dedicaiiion Fee Ordinance. Mr. <br />Smi.r be asked to provide an estimate of the fair market <br />vaJ m acre of land within this area so that a park <br />dedi fee can be determined and approved by the Park <br />Commi* <br />The enclosed resolution has been drafted approving the three <br />lot subdivision that would create a new riparian lot, subject tc <br />the findings and conditions recommended by the Planning <br />Commission. <br />.V <br />j