My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-27-1990 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1990
>
08-27-1990 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/6/2024 12:14:54 PM
Creation date
12/6/2024 12:10:21 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
609
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
A RBSOLOTIOM GRANTING <br />A VARIANCB TO <br />MUNICIPAL ZONING CODS <br />SECTION 10.23, SUBDIVISION 6 (B), <br />AND ADVISING FUTURE BUYERS OR OffNERS <br />OP THE PROPERTY OF THE POTENTIAL NEED <br />FOR A HOLDING TANK <br />FILE #1576 <br />WHEREAS, John and Kit Wojcik (hereinafter "the applicants") <br />are owners of the property located at 3310 Bayside Road within the <br />City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: <br />Lot 17, Auditor's Subdivision #203, Hennepin County, MN, <br />(hereinafter "the property") <br />WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City of Orono <br />for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.23, Subdivision 6 <br />(B) to permit the construction of additions to the existing residence, <br />such additions being located 27.7' from the side lot line where a 30’ <br />side setback is normally required. <br />Minnesota : <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, <br />FINDINGS <br />1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1576. <br />2. The property is located in the LR~1A Single Family Lakeshore <br />Residential Zoning District. <br />3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on <br />August 20, 1990 and recommended approval of the proposed <br />variance based upon the following findings: <br />a. The house site on the adjacent property to the east will <br />be approximately 150-200' to the rear, hence the proposed <br />additions will not intensify the perceived density of the <br />neighborhood. <br />b. The proposed additions are no closer to the side lot <br />line than the existing house. The hardship is the location <br />of the existing house, with the intent to provide a more <br />functional entryway. <br />Page 1 of 4
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.