08-27-1990 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

for master planning in the land use and if possible submission of a comprehensive plan amendment. It would probably not be appropriate at this time to undertake any attendant rezonings until there was an interest in redevelopment of the property by the private owner. In October the Council did authorize an extension of the contract as noted on Attachment C Dahlgren, Shardlow and Uban has been asked to estimate the cost of completing the master planning process. This will be presented to Council at its next meeting. (The staff is also reviewing the need for an update to its comprehensive plan in light of the recent Metro Council reguirements. It is not anticipated at this time that the staff will not be having much need for outside help.) Issue #3. If the City has gone forward on #1 and #2 does it desire to undertake any active steps to assist in making the changes happen. a. Market to private businesses b. Assemble land c. Undertake public financing There did not seem to be any interest in having governmental participation active in implementing any of the desired changes. Perhaps the only level of participation in improvement is the beautification plan and perhaps local assistance for that. ALTERNATIVES - 1. Indicate level of interest in undertaking master planning. 2. Establishment of further consideration at the February 26, 1990 Council meeting. 3. Table for further discussion. 4. Indicate no desire to go any further. RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that the Council table the matte”r“until its February 12, 1990 meeting if it is interested in undertaking the master planning process. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by _that the Council having indicated its desire Tn further exploring master planning table the issue until February 12, 1990, to review the cost. Ayes _, Nays _. cc: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Director John Shardlow/Ed Hassek, Dahlgren, Shardlow & Uban